Case Summary
Beena Thomas is the plaintiff seeking a mandatory injunction against Muhammed Rashid and others. The suit has been dismissed as withdrawn after the plaintiff's application was allowed.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the application IA 2/25 and dismissed the suit as withdrawn.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Since, IA 2/25 is allowed, suit is dismissed as withdrawn.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Beena Thomas
- Party Age
- 53
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Muhammed Rashid
- Party Age
- 32
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Kozhikode Corporation
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- KU Bini
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Milu
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Meghanadhan
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Smt.VG Neena
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.KS Rajagopalan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Mandatory Injunction
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Plaintiff presented a suit for mandatory injunction.
Evidence:
IA 2/25 is allowed. Since, IA 2/25 is allowed, suit is dismissed as withdrawn.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Beena Thomas vs Muhammed Rashid et al regarding mandatory injunction.
Case Code Year
Case between Beena Thomas vs Muhammed Rashid et al regarding mandatory injunction.