Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 107 / 2022

Case between Beena Thomas vs Jaseed P et al regarding mandatory injunction and permanent prohibitory injunction.

Court
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF – I
Judge
Smt.Meera John K.
Order Date
2025-07-09
Duration
Case Closed
Wed, 07/09/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Beena Thomas, the plaintiff, filed a suit seeking mandatory and permanent prohibitory injunction against several defendants including Jaseed P. The court dismissed the suit as withdrawn after allowing the interim application.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit filed by the plaintiff was dismissed as withdrawn after the court allowed the interim application.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit filed by the plaintiff was dismissed as withdrawn after the court allowed the interim application.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Since IA 5/25 is allowed, suit is dismissed as withdrawn.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Beena Thomas
Party Age
54
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jaseed P
Party Age
50
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sulfath CA
Party Age
40
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Koyamu
Party Age
65
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Hamsa
Party Age
65
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Hajara
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt.VG Neena
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.Dilkush VK
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.KS Rajagopalan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Mandatory Injunction
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
Plaintiff filed for mandatory injunction.
Evidence:
Plaint presented by the plaintiff under Section 26, Order VII, Rule 1 of CPC for mandatory injunction and permanent prohibitory injunction.
Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
Plaintiff filed for permanent prohibitory injunction.
Evidence:
Plaint presented by the plaintiff under Section 26, Order VII, Rule 1 of CPC for mandatory injunction and permanent prohibitory injunction.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Beena Thomas vs Jaseed P et al regarding mandatory injunction and permanent prohibitory injunction.
Case Code Year
Case between Beena Thomas vs Jaseed P et al regarding mandatory injunction and permanent prohibitory injunction.

Case Flags

Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Case Filed
Sat, 01/01/2022 - 12:00
Case Closed
Wed, 07/09/2025 - 12:00
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Tue, 09/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Dr.Mahfoos Rahim vs Muslim Educational Society (Regd.) et al regarding suspension and inquiry proceedings
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF – I, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Dr. Saliq Mohammed N. et al vs Muslim Edcational Society (Regd) et al regarding dismissal for default.
ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Illath Abdul Majeed et al vs Minas Thenanchery regarding declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction.
IN THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Dayaana K. vs Marunadan Malayalee et al regarding damages and mandatory injunction.
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Punnya Ranjith vs State of Kerala, Deputy Director Education, General Convenor regarding suit dismissal
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I
Civil Suit Defendant Won