Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 23/2024

Case between Bank of Maharashtra vs Pramod.K.M regarding realisation of money

Court
Munsiff-II, Kozhikode
Judge
Smt. Savitha.T.P
Order Date
2025-06-27
Duration
approximately-7 years 5 months
Case Closed
Fri, 06/27/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves Bank of Maharashtra as the plaintiff and Pramod.K.M as the defendant regarding the default on a loan. The plaintiff claims that the defendant borrowed money and failed to pay it back as agreed.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay the claimed amount with interest and costs.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendants are directed to pay jointly and severally Rs.1,19,045/- to the plaintiff with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of the suit till realisation.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay the claimed amount with interest and costs.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaint claim of borrowal and default of payment stands proved by the affidavit and documents which remain unchallenged.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaint claim of borrowal and default of payment stands proved by the affidavit and documents which remain unchallenged.
Supporting Evidence
The plaint claim of borrowal and default of payment stands proved by the affidavit of PW1 and Exts.A1 to A8 documents which remains unchallenged.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: The defendants are directed to pay jointly and severally Rs.1,19,045/- (Rupees One Lakh Nineteen Thousand And Forty Five Only) to the plaintiff with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of the suit till realisation.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Bank of Maharashtra
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Pramod.K.M
Party Age
48
Plaintiffs Documents
Original Loan application, Demand promissory note, Deed of hypothecation for all facilities, Balance and security confirmation letter by borrower, True copy of lawyer notice, Original postal receipt, Acknowledgment card, Certified extract of the statement of account from 10-01-2018 to 06-01-2024
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.N.Ramakrishnan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Adv.P.T.Dileep
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendants are directed to pay Rs.1,19,045/- to the plaintiff with interest.
Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: 1. The defendants are directed to pay jointly and severally Rs.1,19,045/- (Rupees One Lakh Nineteen Thousand And Forty Five Only) to the plaintiff with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of the suit till realisation.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendants are directed to pay the costs of the suit to the plaintiff.
Evidence:
The defendants are also directed to pay jointly and severally costs of the suit to the plaintiff.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Original loan application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Used to establish the initial loan request made by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Demand Promissory Note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Serves as evidence of the defendant's promise to repay the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Deed of hypothecation for all facilities
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document securing the loan against the defendant's assets.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Balance and security confirmation letter by borrower
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Confirms the borrower's agreement on balance and security.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: True copy of Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Used as evidence of attempts to recover the amount due.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Original Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proof of delivery of the lawyer's notice to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Serves as evidence of receipt of the notice by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Certified extract of the statement of account from 10-01-2018 to 06-01-2024
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Details the transactions and outstanding amounts owed by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A8

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between Bank of Maharashtra vs Pramod.K.M regarding realisation of money
Case Code Year
Case between Bank of Maharashtra vs Pramod.K.M regarding realisation of money

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Case Filed
Wed, 01/10/2018 - 12:00
Case Closed
Fri, 06/27/2025 - 12:00
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Canara Bank vs Mathew.P.J regarding recovery of money.
Munsiff-II, Kozhikode
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Maharastra vs Sheheer.P regarding realisation of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF-II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs M/s.Bouchon Cakes regarding realisation of money
IN THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF- II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between The State Bank of India vs Sugil.G.S et al regarding realization of money
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF -II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Karnataka Bank Limited vs Ananya.M et al regarding realisation of money
MUNSIFF-II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won