Case Summary
The case involves Bank of Baroda as the petitioner against Dinesan KP and Abdul Latheef. The petition is about an enquiry which was dismissed for default due to lack of representation by the decree holder.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the enquiry petition due to the decree holder's lack of readiness and absence in representation.
Key Reasoning:
The decree holder failed to present themselves for enquiry despite given chances.
The decree holder failed to present themselves for enquiry despite given chances.
Why Defendant Won:
The decree holder failed to present themselves for enquiry despite given chances.
The decree holder failed to present themselves for enquiry despite given chances.
Supporting Evidence
Decree Holder has no representation. Inspite of chances given, Decree Holder is not ready for enquiry.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, EP is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Bank of Baroda
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Dinesan KP
- Party Age
- 58
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Abdul Latheef
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Petitioner
- Advocate Name
- Smt.Husna CPM
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.CV Jithesh
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
EP is dismissed for default.
Evidence:
Decree Holder has no representation. Inspite of chances given, Decree Holder is not ready for enquiry. Hence, EP is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Execution Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
EP
Case Code Year
2023