Case Summary
B. Rajendranath is the petitioner seeking rent control relief against Anju Prasad, the counter petitioner. The court has dismissed the petition for default due to a defect in the steps not being served.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the petition for default due to a defect in service.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence petition is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- B. Rajendranath
- Party Age
- 53
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Anju Prasad
- Party Age
- 34
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Solomon. J
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Peter Solomon
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Smt. Haira Solomon
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Smt. Anu philip
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The petition was dismissed for default due to a defect in steps not served.
Evidence:
Hence petition is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between B. Rajendranath vs Anju Prasad regarding Rent Control
Case Code Year
Case between B. Rajendranath vs Anju Prasad regarding Rent Control