Original Suit No. 427/2022

Case between Ayantavila Sree Mahalekshmi Temple (Devaswom) et al vs Suresh Kumar. R. et al regarding dismissal of suit

Court

IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA

Judge

Sri. ARAVIND. P.

Order Date

2025-09-19

Duration

Case Closed

Fri, 09/19/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves Ayantavila Sree Mahalekshmi Temple represented by its Secretary S. Sujanalal against several defendants including Suresh Kumar. R. The suit was dismissed as not pressed by the plaintiffs.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Case Type

Original Suit

Final Judgment

The suit was dismissed as not pressed by the plaintiffs with no order as to costs.

Key Reasoning:
The plaintiffs did not pursue the case.

Why Defendant Won:
Not available

Supporting Evidence

The plaintiffs endorsed that suit is not pressed.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence the suit is dismissed as not pressed. No order as to costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Ayantavila Sree Mahalekshmi Temple (Devaswom)
Relation: Represented by

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Sujanalal
Party Age: 45
Relation: S/o Sukumaran

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Suresh Kumar. R.
Party Age: 58
Relation: S/o Reghunathan

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Sudheesh
Party Age: 43
Relation: S/o Surendran

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Surendralal
Party Age: 55
Relation: S/o Nadesan

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Sri. H. Sumanas
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Sri. R. Suresh Babu
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Sri. M. Chandran
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other

Outcome: Dismissed

Description:

The suit is dismissed as not pressed.

Evidence:

suit is not pressed . Hence the suit is dismissed as not pressed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification