Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
R C P No. 68/2022

Case between Ayanikkad Muraleedhar et al vs Anandan regarding Rent Control

Court
Rent Control Court/Additional Munsiff-II
Judge
Smt.Anjali.P
Order Date
2025-12-06
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Ayanikkad Muraleedhar and Mahija Muraleedhar are petitioners seeking to proceed with a rent control matter. The respondent is Anandan, and the court dismissed the petition for default due to the absence of the petitioners for evidence.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the petition for default as the petitioners were absent for evidence. This led to the conclusion of the case without further proceedings.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the petition for default as the petitioners were absent for evidence. This led to the conclusion of the case without further proceedings.
Key Reasoning:
Petitioners failed to appear for the evidence which led to the dismissal of their application.
Why Defendant Won:
Petitioners failed to appear for the evidence which led to the dismissal of their application.
Supporting Evidence
Petitioner has filed application for adjournment of evidence. No medical document produced in connection with IA 4/25. Petitioner No.2 is also not present for evidence.

Judgment Evidence:

IA 4/25 dismissed. Hence, RCP dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Ayanikkad Muraleedhar
Party Age
74
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Mahija Muraleedhar
Party Age
59
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Anandan
Party Age
73
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.T.Nandakumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.N.Manoj
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
RCP dismissed for default
Evidence:
RCP dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Rent Control
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Ayanikkad Muraleedhar et al vs Anandan regarding Rent Control
Case Code Year
Case between Ayanikkad Muraleedhar et al vs Anandan regarding Rent Control

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Suja Babu et al vs P.S. Sivaram regarding Rent Control
MUNSIFF-II, KOZHIKODE
Rent Control Defendant Won
Case between Suja Babu et al vs Ayishabi Kadakkalakam et al regarding Rent Control
MUNSIFF-II, KOZHIKODE
Rent Control Defendant Won
Case between Muhammad Abdul Akbar et al vs Abdul Saleem M et al regarding Rent Control.
RENT CONTROL COURT/ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-II
Rent Control Defendant Won
Case between P. Ahammed Saithu Muhammed et al vs T. Druvan regarding Rent Control
Munsiff-II Court, Kozhikode
Rent Control Defendant Won
Case between Kannankai Kadeesa et al vs Mullaveettil Sakeer Hussain regarding Rent Control
Munsiff-II, Kozhikode
Rent Control Plaintiff Won