Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 110 OF 2014

Case between Asiya vs Unneenkutty et al regarding partition

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
Smt. Vincy T.V.
Order Date
2018-06-22
Duration
Approximately 4 years
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Asiya, aged 75, daughter of Thelath Muhammed, filed a suit for partition against Unneenkutty and others. The suit was dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiff.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit for partition was dismissed with costs due to the absence of the plaintiff.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Dismissal of suit with costs
Case Type
Partition Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Judgment Evidence:

Suit for partition. The counsel for plaintiff reported that he has no instruction from his client. Defendant is present. Name of the plaintiff is called. Absent. No representation. Hence suit is dismissed with costs.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Asiya (75 years) Karinkapara Chekkikayil, Kurumbathoor

Defendants

Unneenkutty (73 years) Thelath House, Rayiranelloor amsom, Nedungottoor desom, Palakkad Taluk Kunheethu (75 years) Not mentioned Koyamutty (70 years) Not mentioned Mammutty (66 years) Not mentioned Unneenkutty (63 years) Not mentioned Saithalavi (55 years) Not mentioned Beepathu (55 years) Vadakkumbram amsom desom, Tirur Taluk Ibrahim kutty (35 years) Not mentioned Moideenkutty (32 years) Not mentioned Ramla (Age not specified years) Not mentioned

Reliefs

Relief Type: Partition
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Suit for partition dismissed with costs due to absence of the plaintiff
Evidence:
The counsel for plaintiff reported that he has no instruction from his client. Defendant is present. Name of the plaintiff is called. Absent. No representation. Hence suit is dismissed with costs.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
Case Filed
Sun, 06/22/2014 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases