Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • About us
  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • Contact Us
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 76 OF 2000

Case between Animangalath Kalliani @ Sinnamalu Amma et al vs Kattingal Kuttan et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Judge
Sri. JANKISH NARAYANAN
Order Date
2019-12-21
Duration
19 years 11 months

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Involves multiple parties regarding theft of coconuts and possession of ancestral property. Plaintiffs seek injunction and recovery of stolen goods.

Judgment Outcome

Partial Relief
Interim Order
Plaintiffs granted partial injunction and costs against defendants regarding theft and possession of property.
Judgment Favored
Partial
Relief Granted
Permanent prohibitory injunction
Case Type
Permanent prohibitory injunction
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiffs showed sufficient evidence of ownership and trespassing by defendants.

Judgment Evidence:

null

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Animangalath Kalliani @ Sinnamalu Amma (65 Years years) Ozhur amsom, Eranallur desom, Tirur Taluk Animangalath Paru Amma's children (58 Years years) Chandran Nair ((died) years) Sreedharan (53 Years years) Thadathil Meenakshi Amma's daughter Ammini (37 Years years)

Defendants

Kattingal Kuttan (25 Years years) Eranhikkal Bhama (22 Years years) Kunnathaparambil Satheesan (25 Years years) Kelappurath Karthikeyan (19 Years years) Madathil Krishnan (35 Years years) Laksham Veedu Colony, Onakkad

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiffs obtained permanent prohibitory injunction against defendants from trespassing onto the property
Evidence:
Suit decreed in part with cost
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
Plaintiffs claimed recovery of ₹3,125 for stolen coconuts
Evidence:
No evidence to support theft claim
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiffs granted costs of the suit from defendants
Evidence:
Cost to follow the event

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Purchase Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Plaintiff's possession over property
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Purchase Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Plaintiff's possession over property
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Purchase Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Plaintiff's possession over property
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Partition Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Plaintiff's title to property
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Permanent Register Extract
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Defendant's claim over the property
Reference:
Ext.B1
Document Type: Adangal Copy
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Defendant's claim over unassessed land
Reference:
Ext.B2

Quick Facts

Location
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Individual

Similar Cases