Case Summary
Complainant alleged that the accused issued a cheque that bounced due to insufficient funds, leading to an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Acquittal under Section 255(1) Cr.P.C.
Case Type
Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The complainant failed to provide incriminating evidence against the accused to prove the issuance of the cheque towards a legally recoverable debt.
The complainant failed to provide incriminating evidence against the accused to prove the issuance of the cheque towards a legally recoverable debt.
Judgment Evidence:
On the basis of my finding on point No 1. the accused is found not guilty of the offence punishable u/s 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
Parties Involved
Plaintiffs
Alikkutty (44 years)
Karimbanakundil(H), Kuzhimanna. PO. Eranad Taluk, Palakkad
Defendants
Muhammed Abdul Noor (38 years)
Kambala(H), Kuttipuram P.O. Tirur Taluk
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Acquittal
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Accused found not guilty of Cheque Dishonour offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act
Evidence:
On the basis of my finding on point No 1. the accused is found not guilty of the offence punishable u/s 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.