Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT 125/2021

Case between Alikkutty. T. P vs Irumbanandiyil Aboobacker Haji regarding dismissal for default

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Judge
Sri. Yadukrishnan. B
Order Date
2025-09-08
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs are Alikkutty. T. P and Asya, while the defendant is Irumbanandiyil Aboobacker Haji. The case involves a suit filed under the Civil Procedure Code, but the plaintiffs were not ready for evidence, leading to the dismissal of the suit for default.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit due to the plaintiffs' failure to present evidence and not being ready for the case.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit due to the plaintiffs' failure to present evidence and not being ready for the case.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff was not present and did not file necessary documents.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff was not present and did not file necessary documents.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff not ready for evidence. Plaintiff not filed proof affidavit. Plaintiff not present today.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, suit is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Alikkutty. T. P
Party Age
67
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Asya
Party Age
56
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Irumbanandiyil Aboobacker Haji
Party Age
59
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. V. G. Niran
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. P. Balagopalan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Smt. Mini. K. Koyeri
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. P. Arun Kumar
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Plaintiff not ready for evidence and not present.
Evidence:
Hence, suit is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Alikkutty. T. P vs Irumbanandiyil Aboobacker Haji regarding dismissal for default
Case Code Year
Case between Alikkutty. T. P vs Irumbanandiyil Aboobacker Haji regarding dismissal for default

Quick Facts

Location
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between KERALA GRAMIN BANK vs MUTHURAJ regarding execution petition
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between SYNDICATE BANK vs ADARSH. A. C et al regarding dismissal of suit.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between JANU vs BAHULEYAN @ BABU regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Thondarkulangara Korumbathi et al vs Thondarkulangara Chekkon et al regarding preliminary decree
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Irumbanandiyil Aboobacker Haji et al vs Haris et al regarding permanent prohibitory and mandatory injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won