Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • About us
  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • Contact Us
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 167 OF 2018

Case between A.K.Subair (et al) vs Muhamed Hasnal.T.C. regarding money realization

Court
THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Judge
Sri. JANKISH NARAYANAN
Order Date
2019-07-03
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

In this suit, A.K.Subair seeks to recover Rs. 30,000 with interest from Muhamed Hasnal.T.C. for damages caused to his vehicle in an accident.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
Plaintiff A.K.Subair was granted Rs. 30,000 with interest and costs from Defendant Muhamed Hasnal.T.C.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Realization of Rs. 30,000 with interest and costs
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
Plaintiff's case was supported by unchallenged evidence and documents.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: (I). The plaintiff is allowed to realise an amount of Rs. 30,000/- Rupees (Thirty Thousand only) with an interest at the rate of 12% per annum from the date of suit till realisation, from the defendant. (II). The plaintiff is allowed to realise the costs of the suit from the defendant.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

A.K.Subair (28 years) Angadikkarantakath House, Chembra Road, Tirur.

Defendants

Muhamed Hasnal.T.C. (33 years) Thekkancheri House, Perasannur.P.O. PIN 679 580.

Reliefs

Relief Type: Damages
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Realization of Rs. 30,000/- with interest from defendant
Evidence:
The plaintiff is allowed to realise an amount of Rs. 30,000/- with an interest at the rate of 12% per annum from the date of suit
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Realization of costs of the suit from the defendant
Evidence:
The plaintiff is allowed to realise the costs of the suit from the defendant

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Cheque
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Evidence that defendant agreed to pay Rs. 30,000/-
Reference:
A1
Document Type: Dishonour Memo
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Indication of insufficient funds for the first cheque
Reference:
A2
Document Type: Cheque
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Second cheque issued by the defendant
Reference:
A3
Document Type: Dishonour Memo
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Memo for the second dishonoured cheque
Reference:
A4
Document Type: Petition
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The petition submitted to Tirur Police Sub Inspector
Reference:
A5
Document Type: Estimate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Cost estimate by Chelladans Maruthi Engineers
Reference:
A6
Document Type: Registered Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notice sent to defendant demanding payment
Reference:
A7

Quick Facts

Location
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases