Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.989/2022

Case between Ajith Kumar.S vs M/s Vayanakkoottayma et al regarding dismissal of suit

Court
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-RCC
Judge
Smt.Salini.B
Order Date
2025-12-16
Duration
Case Code No.
989
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Ajith Kumar.S filed a suit against M/s Vayanakkoottayma and G.Viswambaran Nair regarding a legal dispute. The court dismissed the suit on the grounds of plaintiff's absence and lack of representation.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of proper representation. Therefore, the case did not proceed further.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Unknown
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of proper representation. Therefore, the case did not proceed further.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff was absent and no representation was made.
Why Defendant Won:
Plaintiff was absent and no representation was made.
Supporting Evidence
No chief affidavit in lieu of examination in chief seen filed. No Petition seeking remove the case from the list.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit is dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Ajith Kumar.S @, Ajith Pavamcode
Party Age
54
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M/s Vayanakkoottayma
Relation
represented by its Secretary
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
G.Viswambaran Nair @ Viswambaran
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Vithura K. Gopakumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt.Achu A.S
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt.Sheeja Kumari. S.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. G.S.Kalkura
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Smt.Rakendu.K.I
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Suit is dismissed due to absence of the plaintiff and lack of representation.
Evidence:
Hence suit is dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Unknown
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2022

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 12/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Subhash Kumar vs Usha Kumari.D regarding dismissal of suit not pressed
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Unknown Defendant Won
Case between R. Hareendra Nath vs Vasantha regarding dismissal of suit
Court of Principal Munsiff
Unknown Defendant Won
Case between Sajad et al vs Sajna Abdeen regarding dismissal of suit
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Unknown Defendant Won
Case between Vasanthakumari.C et al vs Leela Devi et al regarding matter settled.
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Unknown Defendant Won
Case between T.S.Satheesh Kumar vs Vijayaraghavan et al regarding a suit for default dismissal.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Unknown Defendant Won