Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.1051/2015

Case between Abdul Rasheed vs Padmakumar regarding fixed deposit renewal.

Court
Court of Additional Munsiff-III
Judge
Smt. Sreelakshmi.C
Order Date
2025-08-02
Duration
approximately-1 year 1 day
Case Code No.
1051
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Abdul Rasheed, the petitioner and decree holder, filed an application to renew a fixed deposit as security for a decree debt. The respondent, Padmakumar, is directed by the court to comply with the terms set forth in previously filed affidavits regarding the fixed deposit.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court has ordered the judgment debtor to renew a fixed deposit of Rs.5 lakhs along with the accrued interest. The amount should not be released until further orders from the court.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Renewal of fixed deposit of Rs.5 lakhs with interest.
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court has ordered the judgment debtor to renew a fixed deposit of Rs.5 lakhs along with the accrued interest. The amount should not be released until further orders from the court.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The judgment debtor agreed to furnish fixed deposit as security for decree debt.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The judgment debtor agreed to furnish fixed deposit as security for decree debt.
Supporting Evidence
The judgment debtor in the affidavit dated 03/07/2025 had undertaken that he is ready to furnish the above said fixed deposit with interest as the security for decree debt.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence application stands allowed accordingly.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Abdul Rasheed
Party Age
68
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Padmakumar
Party Age
58
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The judgment debtor is directed to renew the fixed deposit for Rs.5,00,000/- along with accrued interest.
Evidence:
Hence the judgment debtor is directed to renew the fixed deposit for Rs.5 lakhs along with accrued interest as on the date of renewal as admitted in the affidavit.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Affidavit
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
The affidavit dated 03/07/2025 submitted by the judgment debtor outlines the commitment to renew the fixed deposit as security for the decree debt.
Reference:
null
Document Type: Fixed Deposit Receipt
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The court directed the renewal of the fixed deposit receipt kept in its safe custody.
Reference:
null

Case Classification

Case Type
Execution Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2015

Quick Facts

Location
Thiruvananthapuram
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Sun, 11/08/2015 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Fri, 08/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between S.Sanalkumar vs Chevron Builders and Relators Private Limited et al regarding Execution Petition
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Execution Petition Unknown
Case between Corporation Bank vs Conglomerate Web connect technologies Pvt Ltd et al regarding Execution Petition
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Execution Petition Defendant Won
Case between Saliha Beevi vs Mujeeb Rahman et al regarding execution petition.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Execution Petition Defendant Won
Case between Summayya Beegum et al vs Abdul Rehim regarding Execution Petition
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Reghupathy et al vs Subi mol M.S regarding execution petition
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won