Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • About us
  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • Contact Us
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 369 OF 2015

Case between Abdu Sathar vs Pallath Saidalavi regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
Smt. Vincy.T.V.
Order Date
2018-03-17
Duration
2 years 11 months 1 day

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Abdu Sathar filed a suit against Pallath Saidalavi seeking permanent prohibitory injunction to prevent obstruction of construction of a wall on the southern side of the property.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court granted a permanent prohibitory injunction restraining the defendant from obstructing the plaintiff from constructing a wall on the southern side of the property and interfering with the plaintiff's peaceful possession.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Permanent Prohibitory Injunction
Case Type
Civil Suit - Permanent Prohibitory Injunction
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
Defendant obstructed plaintiff's construction activities and possessed no right title or interest over the property.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result the suit is decreed as follows:- Defendant and his men are restrained by way of permanent prohibitory injunction from obstructing the plaintiff from constructing the wall in the southern side of the plaint schedule property leaving four feet for edavazhi, and restrained the defendant from obstructing the plaintiff in his peaceful possession of the property.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Abdu Sathar (43 years) Chakkantakath House, Pachattiri amsom, Paravanna desom, Tirur Taluk, Pin: 676 502

Defendants

Pallath Saidalavi (49 years) Pallath House, Pachattiri amsom, Tirur Taluk, Paravanna desom and post, Pin: 676 502

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Prohibitory Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendant and his men are restrained from obstructing plaintiff's construction activities and interfering with peaceful possession.
Evidence:
In the result the suit is decreed as follows:- Defendant and his men are restrained by way of permanent prohibitory injunction from obstructing the plaintiff from constructing the wall in the southern side of the plaint schedule property leaving four feet for edavazhi, and restrained the defendant from obstructing the plaintiff in his peaceful possession of the property.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Jenm Assignment Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Transfer of property to plaintiff
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Commissioner's Report and Plan
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Inspection of property boundaries
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Certified Copy of Judgment
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Judgment in CMA. 2/2011
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Report on property inspections
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type: Plan
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Property layout
Reference:
Ext.C2

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
Case Filed
Mon, 03/16/2015 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases