Home | Niyamam AI- Beta

Displaying 2331 - 2335 of 4243

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Case between Prasad et al vs Pandaraparambil Veyudhan's Wife Ammunni et al regarding setting aside an ex-parte final decree

Civil Suit - Set Aside Ex-parte Decree

INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO.2161 OF 2016

Tirur

2017-07-03

9 years 3 months 2 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Marunnum Kuzhiyil Asokan vs Leela regarding restoration petition

Restoration Petition

Restoration Petition No.1194/2017

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-07-01

0 years, 1 months, 9 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Sree Gokulam Chit & Finance Co. Pvt.Ltd. vs Surendran.N.V regarding dishonour of cheque

Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour

S.T. No:111/2015

Tirur

2017-07-01

Approximately 2 years

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Krishnan.K et al vs State of Kerala et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit - Permanent Prohibitory Injunction

ORIGINAL SUIT NO.414 OF 2014

Tirur

2017-06-27

2 years 4 months 6 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Cholakkal Pathumma Umma et al vs Erukattil Narayanan et al regarding boundary fixation

Civil Suit - Boundary Fixation

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 115 OF 2005

Tirur

2017-06-20

11 years

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

42%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 4,243 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength Medium Impact

Average Case Duration 1.5 years

Settlement Likelihood 14%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 126 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 98 cases)
Jenm Assignment Deed (in 83 cases)
Commission Plan (in 79 cases)
Tax receipt (in 70 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 1779
Defendant Won: 1249

1249

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

27%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs failed to pay necessary fees, leading to case dismissals for default.

Found in 27 cases (27%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Plaintiffs did not provide sufficient evidence to support their claims or prove financial means.

Found in 25 cases (25%) High Impact

Absence of the Petitioner

Cases were dismissed due to plaintiffs not appearing in court when required.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Failure to Take Required Steps

Plaintiffs often failed to take necessary procedural steps, like issuing notices, leading to dismissals.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Absence of the Petitioner

Failure to Take Required Steps

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?