Home | Niyamam AI- Beta

Displaying 1691 - 1695 of 3432

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Case between Shahida Hidayath vs Sheeba et al regarding injunction

Civil Suit - Injunction

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 107 OF 2016

Tirur

2017-02-09

1 year

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Illikkal Cheriya Ayamu et al vs Velayudhan et al regarding injunction

Civil Suit - Injunction

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 346 OF 2016

Tirur

2017-02-09

1 year

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Saidali, Nazar et al vs Sakkeer Husain, Vasu et al regarding injunction

Civil Suit - Injunction

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 407 OF 2014

Tirur

2017-11-03

3 years

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Basheer and Fathima vs Nafeesa et al regarding boundary fixation

Civil Suit - Boundary Fixation

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 24 OF 2015

Tirur

2017-02-08

1 year

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Saidalavi vs Kareem et al regarding injunction

Civil Suit - Injunction

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 70 OF 2015

Tirur

2017-02-08

2 years 11 months 17 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

48%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 3,432 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 1.5 years

Settlement Likelihood 14%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 82 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 82 cases)
Jenm Assignment Deed (in 64 cases)
Agreement (in 58 cases)
Tax receipt (in 51 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 1649
Defendant Won: 1111

1111

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

24%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Failure to Provide Evidence

Plaintiff did not submit sufficient evidence to support claims or prove the means of the respondents.

Found in 24 cases (24%) High Impact

Non-Payment of Batta Fees

Petition was dismissed due to the plaintiff's failure to pay necessary batta fees for proceeding.

Found in 21 cases (21%) High Impact

Absence of the Petitioner

Many petitions were dismissed due to the petitioner's failure to appear in court during the hearings.

Found in 20 cases (20%) High Impact

Lack of Representation

Cases were dismissed as plaintiffs failed to have legal representation or did not take necessary procedural steps.

Found in 16 cases (16%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Failure to Provide Evidence

Non-Payment of Batta Fees

Absence of the Petitioner

Lack of Representation

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?