Home | Niyamam AI- Beta

Displaying 1226 - 1230 of 3431

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Case between Areeparambil Hamza et al vs Ramadas.P.V regarding boundary fixation

Civil Suit - Boundary fixation

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 138 OF 20 13

Tirur

2017-10-10

4 years

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Al Hind Tours and Travels Pvt. Ltd. vs Mundekat Sameer regarding decree petition

Civil Suit - Decree Petition

EP 147/2016

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-10-10

1 year, 4 months, 4 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Peringottukara Namboothiri Yoga kshema Sabha vs E. Jayarajan regarding settlement in adalath

Civil Suit

EP 170/2016

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-10-10

1 year, 2 months, 29 days

Dismissed

View Full Details

Case between Sree Gokulam Chit and finance Co.Pvt. Ltd and A.P Seetharaman regarding Section 138 of N.I. Act

Criminal Case - Section 138 of N.I. Act

S.T. No:79/2017

Tirur

2017-10-10

2 years

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Perumanna Klari Service Sahakarana Bank vs Prajeesh Chettiyam thodi concerning loan satisfaction

Civil Execution Petition

EP 48/2017

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-10-09

0 years, 7 months, 7 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

48%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 3,431 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 1.5 years

Settlement Likelihood 14%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 82 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 81 cases)
Jenm Assignment Deed (in 64 cases)
Agreement (in 58 cases)
Tax receipt (in 51 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 1649
Defendant Won: 1109

1109

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Missing or Weak Documentary Evidence

Plaintiff could not provide adequate proof of ownership, possession, or transaction records.

High Impact

Delay in Filing or Procedural Lapses

Cases dismissed due to filing after limitation period or not following proper procedures.

Medium Impact

Contradictory Witness Statements

Witnesses provided conflicting testimony or failed to appear during proceedings.

Medium Impact

Insufficient Evidence of Ownership

Could not establish clear chain of title or prove continuous possession.

High Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Missing or Weak Documentary Evidence

Delay in Filing or Procedural Lapses

Contradictory Witness Statements

Insufficient Evidence of Ownership

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?