Home | Niyamam AI- Beta

Displaying 896 - 900 of 3169

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Case between Saraswathy vs Meenakshi et al regarding property delivery

Civil Suit

EP 191/2017

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-10-30

0 years, 2 months, 19 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Sasidharan vs Meenakshi et al regarding property delivery

Civil Suit

EP 192/2017

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-10-30

0 years, 2 months, 19 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Sulojana et al vs Meenakshi et al regarding property delivery

Civil Execution Petition

EP 193/2017

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-10-30

0 years, 2 months, 19 days

Unknown

View Full Details

Case between Shafi vs Jafar regarding Cheque Dishonour

Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour

S.T. No:17/2016

Tirur

2017-10-30

3 years

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between C.Krishnan kutty vs Koyakutty regarding dishonour of cheque

Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour (Section 138 N.I. Act)

S.T. No:51/2016

Tirur

2017-10-30

1 year, 5 months, 8 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

50%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 3,169 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 1.5 years

Settlement Likelihood 15%

Common Winning Factors:

Lawyer Notice (in 73 cases)
Commission Report (in 69 cases)
Jenm Assignment Deed (in 60 cases)
Tax receipt (in 51 cases)
Agreement (in 43 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 1600
Defendant Won: 1076

1076

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

32%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Failure to Provide Evidence

Plaintiffs often failed to present adequate evidence related to the means of the respondents.

Found in 32 cases (32%) High Impact

Non-Payment of Batta

Frequent defaults were noted due to non-payment of batta required for proceeding with the cases.

Found in 27 cases (27%) High Impact

Absence of the Petitioner

Cases were dismissed when the petitioner did not appear in court, affecting their chance for success.

Found in 22 cases (22%) Medium Impact

Lack of Necessary Documents

Dismissals occurred frequently due to plaintiffs not producing necessary documents required by the court.

Found in 19 cases (19%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Failure to Provide Evidence

Non-Payment of Batta

Absence of the Petitioner

Lack of Necessary Documents

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?