Home | Niyamam AI- Beta

Displaying 606 - 610 of 3169

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Case between Kalathilparambil Muhammed's children et al vs Subaida regarding partition

Civil Suit - Partition

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 363 OF 2014

Tirur

2018-02-01

3 years approx

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Perumanna Klari Service Sahakarana Bank vs Muhammed Haneefa Neduvancheri regarding default petition

Civil Suit - Default Petition

EP 69/2017

Tirur, Malappuram

2018-02-01

0 years, 10 months, 29 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Perumanna Klari Service Sahakarana Bank vs Samsudeen Poniyeri regarding debt satisfaction

Civil Suit - Debt Satisfaction

EP 46/2017

Malappuram

2018-02-01

0 years, 11 months, 3 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Niramarathur Co-operative Bank et al vs Kaaliyadan Ummar et al regarding full amount received

Execution Proceeding

EP 181/2017

Tirur,Malappuram

2018-02-01

0 years, 5 months, 27 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Mandayappurath Harifa vs Mandayapurath Ammeerali et al regarding partition

Civil Suit - Partition

ORIGINAL SUIT NO.172 OF 2017

Tirur

2018-01-29

1 year

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

50%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 3,169 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 1.5 years

Settlement Likelihood 15%

Common Winning Factors:

Lawyer Notice (in 73 cases)
Commission Report (in 69 cases)
Jenm Assignment Deed (in 60 cases)
Tax receipt (in 51 cases)
Agreement (in 43 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 1600
Defendant Won: 1076

1076

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

21%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Petitioners frequently failed to pay necessary fees, leading to petitions dismissed for default.

Found in 21 cases (21%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Many cases were dismissed due to insufficient evidence to support claims or show financial capacity of respondents.

Found in 21 cases (21%) High Impact

Failure to Take Necessary Steps

Petitioners often did not take required procedural actions, such as issuing notices or filing documents.

Found in 19 cases (19%) High Impact

Absence of the Petitioner

Numerous petitions were dismissed due to the petitioner's failure to appear in court proceedings.

Found in 17 cases (17%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Failure to Take Necessary Steps

Absence of the Petitioner

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?