Similar Cases
Based on: OS. No. 521/2022 — Case between Rajeevan vs Celin regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
48 matching cases found, ranked by shared legal context
OS. No. 704/2018
Case between Ansad et al vs Jameela Beevi et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, Ansad and Nabeesath, are seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, Jameela Beevi and Nadirsha, to prevent them from interfering with a pathway they have been using for access to their properties. The defendants deny the existence of the pathway and claim it belongs solely to them.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 807/2024
Case between G. Haridasan Potty vs Perumon Sree Durga Bhagavathy Temple Devaswom et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
G. Haridasan Potty filed a suit for permanent prohibitory injunction against Perumon Sree Durga Bhagavathy Temple Devaswom after the defendants aimed to obstruct his daily rituals at the temple. The case centers around the plaintiff's rights to perform rituals at the temple without interference.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No.788/2019
Case between Saneer et al vs Sijo Mary regarding discharge of temporary injunction.
The case involves Saneer and Fousiya as additional defendants, seeking to discharge a temporary injunction obtained by the plaintiff, Sijo Mary. The plaintiff claims a right of way over the property owned by the defendants, leading to disputes over property access.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 237/2022
Case between Suresh Kumar.S. vs Narayana Pillai et al regarding Permanent Prohibitory Injunction
The plaintiffs, Suresh Kumar.S. and Bindu Lekha, are seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, Narayana Pillai and Madhusudhanan Pillai, to prevent them from interfering with the construction of boundary walls on their property. The plaintiffs assert that they are the rightful owners of the property and have faced disturbances from the defendants.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No.994/2016
Case between Raveendran Pillai et al vs Kerala State et al regarding injunction.
Raveendran Pillai and Beena filed a suit against the Kerala State and other defendants regarding an injunction. The suit was dismissed as not pressed by the plaintiffs.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No.210/2025
Case between Meloot Sree Durga Padmavathy Devi Temple et al vs Biju Panicker et al regarding Temporary Injunction
The petitioners include the Meloot Sree Durga Padmavathy Devi Temple and its representatives, who are seeking a temporary injunction against the respondents to prevent them from obstructing the reinstallation of the temple idol. The respondents include members of the temple committee who are alleged to be causing disruptions.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 535/2021
Case between Yesudasan vs Jincy et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiff, Yesudasan, filed a suit for a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants Jincy, Binu, and an unnamed older defendant. The case arose from disputes over a pathway used by both parties and previous incidents of trespassing and threats by the defendants.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 535/2021
Case between Yesudasan vs Jincy et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff, Yesudasan, claims ownership of a property and seeks a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants who have allegedly trespassed and threatened him. The defendants express interest in purchasing the property but resort to violence when their demands are not met.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 1011/2023
Case between Dileep K J vs Raju et al regarding Permanent Prohibitory Injunction
The plaintiff Dileep K J is seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants Raju and his family members, who are allegedly threatening to encroach upon his property. The plaintiff claims ownership of the land and seeks to prevent defendants from trespassing and demolishing his property boundary.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 828/2018
Case between Vishnu vs N. Muthulakshmi et al regarding Permanent Prohibitory Injunction
Vishnu filed a suit against N. Muthulakshmi and Ramdas Potty for a permanent prohibitory injunction to restrain the defendants from evicting him from the rented property. The plaintiff claimed that the defendants threatened him to vacate the premises unlawfully.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No. 166/2023
Case between Adv.V.Vinayachandran et al vs Gayathri Devi regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiffs, three advocates, are tenants of rooms owned by the defendant and are seeking to prevent eviction due to a rent hike. They claim that the defendant's actions threaten their peaceful possession and enjoyment of the property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 815/2023
Case between Sadasivan vs Shiju regarding Permanent Prohibitory Injunction
The plaintiff, Sadasivan, filed a suit against the defendant, Shiju, seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction to restrain the defendant from obstructing the pathway on his property. The case revolves around the plaintiff's right to use the B schedule pathway for agricultural purposes.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 284/2023
Case between Sasikumar vs Ushadevarajan, Thankamani Vijayan regarding permanent prohibitory Injunction
The plaintiff, Sasikumar, is seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, Ushadevarajan and Thankamani Vijayan, who are allegedly attempting to encroach upon his property. The defendants have also obstructed the reconstruction of a compound wall.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 976/2023
Case between Emilin Binoy et al vs Thresya Fernandes @ Tresa Albert et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiff, Emilin Binoy, seeks a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, Thresya Fernandes and Jannet, who are attempting to illegally encroach on her property. The plaintiff claims ownership of the property and has faced threats and harassment from the defendants.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 304/2022
Case between Karmali vs Charles regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff Karmali, the absolute owner of a property, filed a suit against the defendant Charles for obstructing access to her property. The defendant allegedly began blocking the only pathway leading to the plaintiff's property, claiming ownership of an adjacent area.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS 470/2024
Case between Soman Pillai vs Radhakrishna Pillai regarding temporary injunction.
Soman Pillai filed a petition against Radhakrishna Pillai for a temporary injunction concerning a property dispute. The plaintiff claims the defendant encroached on his property and caused damage.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No. 753/2024
Case between Sankaran Nampoothiri vs Kollam Muncipal Corporation regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
Sankaran Nampoothiri is the plaintiff seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against Kollam Muncipal Corporation. The plaintiff alleges that the defendant is planning to trespass and demolish boundary walls of his property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. 615/2025
Case between Kiran Krishna vs S.D. Ajith Kumar regarding Temporary Injunction
Kiran Krishna, the plaintiff, seeks a temporary injunction against S.D. Ajith Kumar, the defendant, who cancelled her booking for a wedding reception at a temple auditorium. The case revolves around the plaintiff's efforts to secure the venue for her marriage reception scheduled for January 3, 2026.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.123/2020
Case between G.Rajesh et al vs State of Kerala et al regarding injunction.
The plaintiffs, G.Rajesh and T. Jayasree, filed a suit for injunction against the State of Kerala and other defendants. The suit was dismissed as not pressed by the plaintiffs.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No. 342/2022
Case between Kanjirammoodu Sree Nagaraja Temple et al vs Bhasuran et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, Kanjirammoodu Sree Nagaraja Temple and its Secretary Ganesh.T, are seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, Bhasuran and Selvakumar. The case revolves around the defendants creating disturbances and attempting to encroach upon the temple property, which is managed by the new committee elected after the defendants were removed.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 601/2020
Case between Reghu. K et al vs Rengan et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiffs, Reghu. K, Ratheesh. K, and Omana, sought a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, Rengan, Ponnamma, and Radhika Rengan, to prevent them from encroaching on a pathway critical to accessing their property. The court examined claims of ownership and usage rights between the parties regarding the D schedule pathway.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 327/2022
Case between Suvarna Kumari vs Vijayamma, Ravi @ Raveendran regarding injunction
The plaintiff, Suvarna Kumari, filed a suit against her siblings, Vijayamma and Ravi, for a perpetual injunction to prevent them from obstructing her access to her property. The case involves disputes over a pathway and rights to the property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 726/2013
Case between Gopinathan Pillai et al vs Sarojini Amma et al regarding declaration and injunction
The plaintiffs, Gopinathan Pillai and others, are suing the defendants, Sarojini Amma and others, over the right of way to a burial ground. The case involves conflicting claims regarding a pathway leading to the burial site.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.937/2013
Case between Radhamani Amma et al vs Kerala State et al regarding declaring the right of easement and for permanent prohibitory injunction.
Radhamani Amma and other plaintiffs filed a suit against the Kerala State and others to declare their right of easement over a property and seek a permanent prohibitory injunction. The case involves multiple petitions for re-opening evidence and appointing a commission advocate.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No. 743/2023
Case between Beena vs Jayan et al regarding Declaration and Injunction
The plaintiff Beena filed a suit against the defendants Jayan and Jayalekshmi for a declaration of her easement rights and to restrain them from interfering with her property. The case involves a property dispute where the defendants removed slabs from the plaintiff's property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 559/2024
Case between Abida Beevi vs Noushar et al regarding injunction and easement by grant.
The plaintiff, Abida Beevi, seeks a declaration of easement by grant and permanent injunction against the defendants who are her legal heirs. The case involves a dispute over a pathway used by the plaintiff to access her property which the defendants attempted to obstruct.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 402/2019
Case between Somarajan. P vs Remani et al regarding declaration of easement and injunction
Somarajan. P filed a suit against Remani and others, seeking declaration of easement by grant and permanent prohibitory injunction over a pathway. The defendants are the heirs of the plaintiff’s deceased brother, who obstructed the plaintiff's access to his property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 658/2018
Case between Angadi Veettil Padmini vs Angadi Veettil Vasudevan et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiff, Angadi Veettil Padmini, is seeking to restrain the defendants from obstructing a pathway to her property. The defendants are relatives of the plaintiff, and the case revolves around the ownership and use of the pathway.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. 143/2021
Case between P.S Prabhakaran et al vs Sathiammal K.S et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, P.S Prabhakaran and Kuttappan, are seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, Sathiammal K.S and Radhakrishna Pilla, regarding a disputed pathway. The plaintiffs claim a right of way over the pathway used for over 20 years, which the defendants allegedly attempted to obstruct.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No.234/2023
Case between Vaikom Coir Vyavasaya Co-Opertive Society Ltd. vs Santhosh P.S. et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiff, Vaikom Coir Vyavasaya Co-Opertive Society Ltd., filed a suit seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants Santhosh P.S. and Ashokan. The defendants have allegedly trespassed and obstructed the peaceful enjoyment of the plaintiff's property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 1485/2014
Case between Meera Biju @ Meera Gangadharan vs V.Jayaprakash et al regarding declaration and Injunction
The plaintiff, Meera Biju, employed in the United Kingdom, seeks declaration and injunction regarding her easement rights over property in Mundakkal Village. The defendants include V.Jayaprakash and State of Kerala officials, who contested her claim over the access to her property.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
RP.No.25/2024 in OS.No.521/2023
Case between Navasudeen.S vs Sira Group regarding review of an earlier order
Navasudeen.S filed a review petition against Sira Group. The case was dismissed for default due to lack of representation from the petitioner.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.930/2016
Case between Sajeev vs T.Unnikrishna Pillai regarding setting aside an exparte decree.
The case involves T.Unnikrishna Pillai as the defendant and Sajeev as the plaintiff. The defendant filed applications to set aside an exparte decree issued for the realization of money.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No. 97/2021
Case between Gopakumar vs K.S.Abdul Manaf regarding Realisation of Money
This case involves a suit filed by Gopakumar for the realization of money against K.S.Abdul Manaf. The court rejected the plaint due to the balance court fee not being remitted.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No. 149/2024
Case between Canara Bank vs Abhilash Aravindakshan regarding Realisation of Money
The plaintiff, Canara Bank, is seeking to recover a loan amount from the defendant, Abhilash Aravindakshan, who failed to repay it. The loan was sanctioned for business expansion, but after repeated reminders, the defendant defaulted, leading to this suit.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS 1013/2023
Case between Bank of India vs Shibina. S et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed.
This case involves Bank of India as the plaintiff and Shibina. S and Shibu.S as defendants. The plaintiff's counsel submitted that the matter has been settled between the parties and is therefore not pressing the suit.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
RP.No.123/2024 in OS.No.854/2018
Case between Vijayendran, Chithra vs Yamunadevi regarding review of order
The case involves the petitioner/plaintiff Vijayendran, Chithra who filed a petition to review an earlier order. The petitioner is seeking to restore the suit to the file.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
RP.No.129/2024 in OS.No.463/2017
Case between Mayadevi vs Malini et al regarding review of a previous order
Mayadevi filed a petition seeking to review a previous court order. The defendants include Malini, Mukesh, Santhakumari, and others.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No.81/2024
Case between Ajas Basheer vs Lekha.T regarding Realisation of Money
The plaintiff, Ajas Basheer, aged 34, filed a suit against the defendant, Lekha.T, aged 44, for the realisation of money. The suit was dismissed as not pressed by the plaintiff.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.109/2024
Case between Rini Titus et al vs Stephen Gomez et al regarding restraining from trespassing into properties
The case involves petitioners Rini Titus and Francis Gabriel seeking to restrain the respondents Stephen Gomez, Shaila, and Sherly Rajendran from trespassing into their properties and creating a new pathway. The petitioners claim that the respondents have falsely claimed a right of way through their properties.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No.448/2020
Case between Sajeevan.C. vs District Collector, Kollam et al regarding Declaration and Injunction.
This suit is filed by the plaintiff under Section 26 Order VII Rule 1 to 7 of the Code of Civil Procedure for Declaration and Injunction. The court rejected the plaint due to non-remittance of the Balance Court Fee.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No. 689/2023
Case between Rajesh Mohan vs Jyothikumar regarding Realisation of Money
The plaintiff, Rajesh Mohan, has filed a suit against the defendant, Jyothikumar, to recover Rs. 5,00,000/- which was borrowed on 19/04/2023 and secured by a cheque that was dishonoured. The defendant did not repay the amount despite receiving a legal notice.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.502/2020
Case between Piyoos vs Sheemol regarding setting aside the order in RP.No.259/2024
Piyoos, aged 44 years, has filed this petition to set aside an earlier order and restore the RP on file. The respondent, Sheemol, aged 50 years, is involved in this matter.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No.363/2024
Case between Mohan Lal.K et al vs Mahesh Krishna Ram regarding Injunction
This case involves Mohan Lal.K and Deviraj as plaintiffs against Mahesh Krishna Ram as the defendant regarding an injunction. The plaintiffs filed a memo stating that the suit is not pressed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No. 571/2019
Case between Canara Bank vs Sabarinatha.S et al regarding Realisation of Money
Canara Bank is suing Sabarinatha.S and others for the recovery of a loan amount. The defendants defaulted on their repayment obligations for an educational loan taken for B.Tech studies.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 327/2020
Case between K.Shamsudeen vs Sreedharan Pillai regarding Realisation of Money
The plaintiff, K.Shamsudeen, filed a suit against the defendant, Sreedharan Pillai, for the realization of money. The case was heard but the plaintiff failed to remit the balance court fee.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No.405/2022
Case between UCO Bank vs Hussain.A et al regarding Realisation of Money.
The plaintiff, UCO Bank, filed a suit against the defendants Hussain.A and Nazarudeen for the realization of money. The court heard the case on 17-02-2025.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
RP.No.246/2024 in OS.No.296/2019
Case between R.Bodhendra Prasad et al vs P.Sulekha et al regarding restoration of suit
The case involves a petition filed by R.Bodhendra Prasad and R.Gopakumar to restore a suit. The petition was heard by the court on 17-02-2025.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won