Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No. 521/2022

Case between Rajeevan vs Celin regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Court
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Judge
Smt. Ragi.S.
Order Date
2025-11-13
Duration
approximately-3 years 4 months
Case Closed
Thu, 11/13/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Rajeevan, the plaintiff, seeks a permanent prohibitory injunction to prevent Celin, the defendant, from obstructing a pathway to his property. The obstruction allegedly began on 01-07-2022 when the defendant attempted to block access.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit is decreed in favor of the plaintiff, restraining the defendant from blocking the pathway. The plaintiff is also entitled to recover costs of the suit.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The defendants and her men are permanently restrained from blocking the plaint B schedule pathway.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit is decreed in favor of the plaintiff, restraining the defendant from blocking the pathway. The plaintiff is also entitled to recover costs of the suit.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff's case stands proved and unchallenged by the pleadings and evidences.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff's case stands proved and unchallenged by the pleadings and evidences.
Supporting Evidence
The deposition of PW1, Ext. A1, attested copy of final decree plan in OS No. 320/2011 of Munsiff Court, Kollam, Ext. A2, attested copy of final decree judgment in OS No. 320/2011, Ext.A3, copy of complaint filed before Secretary, Kollam Corporation and Ext.A4, copy of receipt issued by Kollam Corporation would prove the plaint claim. There is no contra evidence to prove otherwise.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed with costs as follows: i. The defendants and her men are permanently restrained from blocking the plaint B schedule pathway for the ingress and egress to plaint A schedule property.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Rajeevan
Party Age
61
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Celin
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Attested copy of final decree plan in OS No. 320/2011, Certified copy of final decree judgment in OS 320/2011, Copy of complaint filed before Secretary, Kollam Corporation, Copy of receipt issued by Kollam Corporation.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Mayyanad T.A. Suresh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Thomas John Morris
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Chethana T.Karma
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendants and her men are permanently restrained from blocking the plaint B schedule pathway.
Evidence:
The defendants and her men are permanently restrained from blocking the plaint B schedule pathway for the ingress and egress to plaint A schedule property.
Relief Type: Cost Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to realise the costs of the suit from the defendant.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is also entitled to realise the costs of the suit from the defendant.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Attested copy of final decree plan
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proves the plaint claim regarding the right of way.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Certified copy of final decree judgment
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Supports the plaintiff's ownership and right of way.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Copy of complaint filed before Secretary, Kollam Corporation
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Documents the plaintiff's complaint about the defendant's actions.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Copy of receipt issued by Kollam Corporation
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Validates the plaintiff's claims regarding the corporation's involvement.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Copy of Photograph
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Visual evidence related to the case.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Substantiates the case of the plaintiff through expert findings.
Reference:
C1 series
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Further evidence from the commissioner supporting the plaintiff's claims.
Reference:
C2 series

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Injunction and Access Rights
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Right of way obstruction
Case Code
Case between Rajeevan vs Celin regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Rajeevan vs Celin regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Fri, 07/01/2022 - 12:00
Case Closed
Thu, 11/13/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 11/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between G. Haridasan Potty vs Perumon Sree Durga Bhagavathy Temple Devaswom et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Ansad et al vs Jameela Beevi et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Raveendran Pillai et al vs Kerala State et al regarding injunction.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Suresh Kumar.S. vs Narayana Pillai et al regarding Permanent Prohibitory Injunction
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Saneer et al vs Sijo Mary regarding discharge of temporary injunction.
Additional Munsiff Court, Kollam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won