Similar Cases
Based on: ORIGINAL SUIT NO 122/2024 — Case between RAKHI @ RAGISHA vs VANIYAM VEETIL MUHAMMAD ALI et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
48 matching cases found, ranked by shared legal context
ORIGINAL SUIT NO 120/2024
Case between Kunhabdulla vs Vaniyam Veetil Muhammad Ali et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
This case involves Kunhabdulla, the plaintiff, who is seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, including Vaniyam Veetil Muhammad Ali, to prevent them from trespassing onto his property for a road widening project. The defendants allegedly entered the property without consent and marked sections they claimed were necessary for the road work.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO 124/2024
Case between SURESH vs VANIYAM VEETIL MUHAMMAD ALI et al regarding perpetual prohibitory injunction.
The case involves plaintiffs SURESH and RAHNA seeking a permanent injunction against defendants VANIYAM VEETIL MUHAMMAD ALI, AKHILA MARIYAT, C. K. NAZAR, K. T. K CHANDRAN, NADAPURAM GRAMA PANCHAYATH, and URALUNGAL LABOUR CONTRACT CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD. to restrain them from trespassing and committing acts of waste on the plaint schedule property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT 19/2018
Case between JASHILNADH. R vs VADAKKAYIL PATHU et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction and declaration
Jashilnadh. R is the plaintiff seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against VADAKKAYIL PATHU and others, who are accused of attempting to unlawfully construct a retaining wall affecting the plaintiff's property rights. The case centers on the right of way to the plaint A schedule property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O. S. No.427/2017
Case between Rev. Fr. K George Jacob vs Vengola Grama Panchayath regarding mandatory injunction and permanent prohibitory injunction
Rev. Fr. K George Jacob filed a suit against Vengola Grama Panchayath for a mandatory and permanent prohibitory injunction. The plaintiff alleges that the Panchayath obstructed the natural flow of rainwater, causing flooding in his property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No.462/2021
Case between Kadeeja vs Kunnamagalam Grama Panchayath regarding mandatory injunction
Kadeeja is the plaintiff claiming ownership over a property that the Kunnamagalam Grama Panchayath has converted into a public road. The plaintiff seeks an injunction to remove the construction on her property.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 354/2021
Case between Mini vs Puzhakkara Nabeesa et al regarding Mandatory and Permanent Prohibitory Injunction
The plaintiff, Mini, is the owner of a property and seeks to remove obstructions put up by the defendants, Puzhakkara Nabeesa and Subair, to access her property. The case revolves around the existence of a public pathway that has been obstructed by the defendants.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
EP/85/2025
Case between Purameri Panchayath vanitha Co operative Society Ltd vs Ratheesh P K et al regarding execution of decree
The petitioner is Purameri Panchayath vanitha Co operative Society Ltd, and the respondent includes Ratheesh P K and others. The case involves the execution of a decree for payment of a debt, with the respondent expressing willingness to repay.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT 132/2024
Case between SHINIL @ DEVASYA @ SHINIL JOSE vs SHEEBA @ MARIYAM @ SHEEBA THOMAS et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
The case involves Shinil Jose as the plaintiff claiming that the defendants trespassed into his property and threatened him, affecting his peaceful life. The plaintiff seeks a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO 11/2025
Case between BUSHARA vs MUHAMMAD ASHRAF regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
BUSHARA instituted this suit against MUHAMMAD ASHRAF to seek a permanent prohibitory injunction restraining him from trespassing into her property. The plaintiff claims that the defendant threatened her and her family over alleged money transactions with her husband, who is abroad.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO 23/2024
Case between KINARULLA PARAMBATH ROOPA et al vs KIZHAKKUM MURI GULIKAN PARIPALANA SAMITHI et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, KINARULLA PARAMBATH ROOPA and others, are seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, KIZHAKKUM MURI GULIKAN PARIPALANA SAMITHI and others, to restrain them from trespassing into the plaint A schedule property and interfering with the plaintiffs' possession.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No 34/2025
Case between Souda vs Executive Engineer, Secretary, Uralunkal Labour Contract Co-operative Society Limited regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiff, Souda, sought a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants to prevent them from trespassing and altering the boundaries of her property. The case revolves around the defendants' alleged encroachment on the plaint schedule property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO 48/2024
Case between Sujith Thachanandiyil vs Rajeesh. E. K et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff, Sujith Thachanandiyil, claims ownership and peaceful possession of a property and seeks an injunction against the defendants, Rajeesh. E. K, Narayani, and Subija, who allegedly trespassed and attempted to dismantle property barriers. The defendants assert they have a right of way through the plaintiff's property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO 3/2024
Case between Sankaran. P. P vs Vijesh et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff, Sankaran. P. P, claims ownership of a property that the defendants trespassed into, causing damage and distress. The plaintiff seeks a permanent injunction to prevent further trespassing and damage.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S.No.51/2022
Case between Sreethu P N vs George P M et al regarding temporary injunction for use of a road.
Sreethu P N filed a petition seeking a temporary injunction to prevent the defendants from blocking a local road that has been in use for 50 years. The defendants are accused of obstructing access to the road, affecting the plaintiff's ability to reach their property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No.20/2023
Case between Niravu Farmers Producer Company Ltd vs The Chathamangalam Grama Panchayath regarding realization of an amount due
Niravu Farmers Producer Company Ltd is the plaintiff seeking to recover an amount due from The Chathamangalam Grama Panchayath, the defendant. The case involved a claim presented under the Code of Civil Procedure.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 509/2018
Case between Indira vs Koodaranhi Grama Panchayath regarding suit dismissal for default
Indira, the plaintiff, was involved in a suit against Koodaranhi Grama Panchayath, the defendant. The case was dismissed for default as the plaintiff was absent during the hearing.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 510/2018
Case between Kelan vs Koodaranhi Grama Panchayath regarding dismissal for default.
Kelan, the plaintiff, is involved in a suit against Koodaranhi Grama Panchayath, the defendant. The plaintiff was absent during the hearing, leading to the dismissal of the case for default.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 511/2018
Case between Indira vs Koodaranhi Grama Panchayath regarding dismissal for default
Indira filed a lawsuit against Koodaranhi Grama Panchayath. The plaintiff was absent during the hearing, leading to the dismissal of the suit for default.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S No. 573/2024
Case between Aleyamma M V vs Pambady Grama Panchayath regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, Aleyamma M V and her son Aby Abraham Varghese, filed a suit against Pambady Grama Panchayath to prevent the closure of a road used for access to their property. The case was heard as the defendant did not file a written statement.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO 28/2025
Case between THARAVATTATH MARIYAM vs C. K. NASAR et al regarding Permanent Prohibitory and Mandatory Injunction
The plaintiff, Tharavattath Mariyam, seeks a permanent prohibitory and mandatory injunction against the defendants who have allegedly trespassed into the plaint schedule property. The plaintiff claims that they caused damage to the Srambi building managed by the committee, which includes the plaintiff.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 289 / 2023
Case between Geetha KP vs Ramesh Babu et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff, Geetha KP, filed a suit against the defendants, Ramesh Babu, Valsan, Ravi, and Surendran K, seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction to prevent them from trespassing on her property and committing acts of waste. The defendants had previously threatened the plaintiff and her husband while attempting to dig on the property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 174/2020
Case between Abdul Manzoor.P.P vs Edathil Balan et al regarding perpetual prohibitory injunction
Abdul Manzoor.P.P filed a suit against Edathil Balan and others for a perpetual prohibitory injunction to prevent them from changing the nature of a road that provides access to his property. The defendants were attempting to encroach upon this road, which is vital for access.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No.92/2024
Case between K.C.Chandran et al vs Sudha et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, K.C.Chandran and B.K.Vasanthakumari, are seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, Sudha and Akhil, to prevent them from obstructing access to their property and from damaging a water meter. The defendants have remained exparte throughout the proceedings.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 141/2018
Case between Madhavi et al vs Ragini et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs Madhavi, Ajitha, Ajayan, Anitha, Ashalatha, and Amitha are seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants Ragini, Rahul, Rekha, and others to prevent trespass on their property. The case revolves around property rights and possession over the disputed land.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 118/2023
Case between Adukkathil Moitheen vs Sunil Kumar. K.P, Aboobacker @ Bakker regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Adukkathil Moitheen has filed a suit against Sunil Kumar. K.P and Aboobacker @ Bakker seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction. The plaintiff claims that the defendants illegally removed soil from his property, causing damage.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 107/2025
Case between Abdulla Sons Private Limited Company et al vs Aneesh regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
This case involves Abdulla Sons Private Limited Company and its Managing Director P.Ahammed Kutty against Aneesh regarding a dispute over property boundaries and the installation of a no parking board. The plaintiff seeks a permanent injunction to prevent the defendant from obstructing their property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 592/2021
Case between Raman vs Thanka et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Raman is the plaintiff seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against Thanka and Abhinand. The defendants are allegedly attempting to claim ownership over the property of the plaintiff, leading to this legal action.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 594/2022
Case between Sabira. M.T et al vs Sudheesh et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
The case involves plaintiffs Sabira. M.T, Sakkeer Hussain, and Kurungott Thanuja seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against defendants Sudheesh, Rathi, and Sulochana. The plaintiffs allege that the defendants obstructed their access to a public way that leads to their properties.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 6/2023
Case between KAPPUMCHALIL DEVI vs GIRIJA et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff, KAPPUMCHALIL DEVI, seeks a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, GIRIJA and V. K. JITHESH KUMAR, to prevent them from trespassing on her property. The case involves disputes over property rights and alleged trespass by the defendants.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 54/2023
Case between Paikkattummal Libin Balakrishnan vs Vazhayiil Meethal Chandran et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiff, Paikkattummal Libin Balakrishnan, is seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants for trespassing into his property. The defendants have allegedly attempted to alter the nature of the property by cutting a road.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 3/2024
Case between Sankaran. P. P vs Vijesh et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiff, Sankaran. P. P, is seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, who allegedly trespassed and caused damage to his property. The defendants have denied the allegations and stated they are not intending to trespass.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No 123/2023
Case between P. Leela vs P. Narayan Nambiar regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
This case involves P. Leela and Padmanabhan Nambiar as plaintiffs seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against P. Narayan Nambiar, the defendant, to prevent trespassing and reducing the width of a road. The defendant has also filed a counterclaim for mandatory injunction.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS 108/2025
Case between Natol Kumaran vs Natol Chandran regarding injunction for temple festival management.
Natol Kumaran, the petitioner, seeks an injunction against Natol Chandran, the first respondent, to prevent him from causing disturbances in the management of temple festivals. The dispute arises from their familial rights and responsibilities regarding the temple and its activities.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS 31/2025
Case between KANNATEENTAVITA SAROJINI AMMA vs MINI regarding injunction
The plaintiff, KANNATEENTAVITA SAROJINI AMMA, filed a petition against MINI seeking an injunction to prevent her from trespassing and demolishing a shop building on the plaint schedule property. The case involves disputes over property ownership and possession.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 922/2021
Case between Lalithamma Radhakrishna Menon vs Cheranellor Grama Panchayath regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, Lalithamma Radhakrishna Menon and her daughter Smitha Radhakrishna Menon, are seeking permanent prohibitory injunction against the Cheranellor Grama Panchayath, claiming that the Grama Panchayath has no authority to maintain a pathway they co-own. The Grama Panchayath contends that the pathway is public and they have the right to maintain it.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 314/2021
Case between Mohammed Faisal et al vs Mulavukad Grama Panchayath regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
The case involves plaintiffs Mohammed Faisal and his wife Shejinamol seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the Mulavukad Grama Panchayath to prevent construction obstructing their access to a public road. Plaintiffs claim ownership and access rights to their property, while the Panchayath argues it holds valid authority to construct an Anganvadi on the disputed land.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S No.754/2019
Case between Thomas @ Baby et al vs Secretary regarding declaration and injunction.
The plaintiffs, Thomas @ Baby and Mathew, claim to be the absolute owners of properties and are contesting the defendant's action of measuring their private road without legal right. The suit seeks to declare the road as private property and prevent the defendant from taking further action.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 682/2017
Case between Jose K Joseph vs Ayarkunnam Grama Panchayath et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
Jose K Joseph, the plaintiff, is the owner of a property who seeks to prevent the defendants from constructing a concrete ramp that would block his access. The defendants include the Panchayath and several neighbors who are asserting the right to construct the ramp.
Civil Suit
Partial
O.S 36/2019
Case between Aruna D. Pillai et al vs Pradeep Kumar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, Aruna D. Pillai and Damodaran Pillai, have filed a suit against defendants Pradeep Kumar, Narayanan Nair, and Chirakkadavu Grama Panchayath regarding a disputed property where the defendants allegedly attempted to widen a pathway encroaching on the plaintiffs' property. The plaintiffs seek a decree to restrain the defendants from such actions.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S 206/2024
Case between Philip vs Erumely Grama Panchayath regarding declaration and injunction.
Philip is the plaintiff claiming possessory rights over a property. The case involves an FIR registered against him by the defendant Panchayath regarding the removal of rubber trees from the property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S 206/2024
Case between Philip vs Erumely Grama Panchayath regarding declaration and injunction.
The plaintiff, Philip, claims possessory rights over a property and seeks an injunction against the Erumely Grama Panchayath, which has allegedly interfered with his rights. The case involves previous ownership documents and claims of adverse possession.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 460 / 2020
Case between Shajahan TP vs Moideen P et al regarding Perpetual prohibitory injunction
The case involves Shajahan TP as the plaintiff seeking a perpetual prohibitory injunction against the defendants. The defendants were absent during the hearings.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 233/2024
Case between Snehaja PV vs Syam Sachith regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Snehaja PV filed a suit against her brother Syam Sachith seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction to prevent him from obstructing her access to their shared property. The court found that the defendant had been obstructing the plaintiff and imposed a decree in her favor.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 45/2021
Case between Premarajan K.N. vs Jiji P. et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction and mandatory injunction
The plaintiff, Premarajan K.N., is seeking relief against defendants Jiji P. and Anujith Ramachandran for alleged invasion of privacy through the installation of CCTV cameras. The defendants have been accused of causing the plaintiff irreparable harm by surveilling him and his family members.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No.102/2021
Case between TP Roopesh et al vs Prameela et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
TP Roopesh and NP Anusooya are the plaintiffs seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against their neighbors, Prameela and Krishna Kumar, for illegal construction on adjacent property. The defendants have violated building rules, causing inconvenience to the plaintiffs.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 41/2017
Case between Shiji.M vs Hassan Haji et al regarding perpetual prohibitory injunction.
Shiji.M filed a suit against Hassan Haji and others seeking a perpetual prohibitory injunction to prevent them from trespassing into her property. The case involves disputes over property rights and unauthorized construction.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 616/2019
Case between Perikkathra Surendran vs Palakurumba Gangadharan et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff, Perikkathra Surendran, a retired civil contractor, filed a suit for permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants for obstructing construction on his property. The plaintiff claimed that the defendants threatened him and his son, assaulted them, and unlawfully impeded construction activities.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No.226/2024
Case between Rosemary vs George regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Rosemary is the plaintiff claiming permanent prohibitory injunction against her brother George. The case revolves around the ownership and potential trespassing of the plaint schedule property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won