Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 314/2021

Case between Mohammed Faisal et al vs Mulavukad Grama Panchayath regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany
Order Date
2025-10-24
Duration
approximately-4 years 1 month
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves plaintiffs Mohammed Faisal and his wife Shejinamol seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the Mulavukad Grama Panchayath to prevent construction obstructing their access to a public road. Plaintiffs claim ownership and access rights to their property, while the Panchayath argues it holds valid authority to construct an Anganvadi on the disputed land.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the plaintiffs' suit for permanent prohibitory injunction, finding that the plaintiffs did not prove their claim of direct access to the Panchayath road. It ruled that the Panchayath has the right to construct the Anganvadi building.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the plaintiffs' suit for permanent prohibitory injunction, finding that the plaintiffs did not prove their claim of direct access to the Panchayath road. It ruled that the Panchayath has the right to construct the Anganvadi building.
Key Reasoning:
The court found that the plaintiffs did not have a valid claim of direct access and their assertions regarding ownership were not substantiated by evidence.
Why Defendant Won:
The court found that the plaintiffs did not have a valid claim of direct access and their assertions regarding ownership were not substantiated by evidence.
Supporting Evidence
The court is satisfied that the plaintiffs have failed to prove their case.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is dismissed with costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Mohammed Faisal
Party Age
50
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Shejinamol
Party Age
38
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mulavukad Grama Panchayath
Relation
Represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Property tax receipt bearing no: 120020101047, Property tax receipt bearing no: 120020102239, Basic tax receipt bearing no: KL07020101377/18, Certified copy of Sale deed No: 3537 of 2016
Defendants Documents
The Certified copy of the relevant page of the asset register

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
A Balagopalan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Rajagopalan A
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sandhya C Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
R Rajesh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
T K Ajithkumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Refused
Description:
The plaintiffs sought a decree for permanent prohibitory injunction restraining the defendants from constructing any structure on the northern side.
Evidence:
The court found that the plaintiffs have failed to prove their case and hence the suit is liable to be dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Property Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
A property tax receipt for the plaintiffs' property.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Property Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Another property tax receipt for the plaintiffs' property.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Basic Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
A basic tax receipt showing the plaintiffs' legal interest in the property.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The certified copy of Sale Deed No. 3537/2016, establishing the plaintiffs' title.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Asset Register
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
A certified copy of the relevant page of the asset register demonstrating ownership.
Reference:
Ext.B1
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
A commission report relevant to the court's findings.
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
A commission report dated 03.09.2022 considered as part of the court's record.
Reference:
Ext.C2

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Unauthorized occupation
Case Code
Case between Mohammed Faisal et al vs Mulavukad Grama Panchayath regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
Case Code Year
Case between Mohammed Faisal et al vs Mulavukad Grama Panchayath regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Panchayat

Similar Cases

Case between P K Haridas et al vs The Udayamperoor Grama Panchayath regarding withdrawal of suit for mandatory injunction.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between P K Haridas et al vs The Udayamperoor Grama Panchayath regarding dismissal of the suit
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Mohammed Faisal vs Mulavukad Grama Panchayath regarding interim injunction
II Additional Munsiff
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Mohammed Faisal et al vs Mulavukad Grama Panchayath regarding approved building plan
II Additional Munsiff Court
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Mr. John Peter vs Edakkattuvayal Grama Panchayat et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
II ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won