| Niyamam AI

Displaying 2651 - 2655 of 21904

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Pushpalatha vs Thiruvananthapuram District Collector et al regarding temporary injunction

Civil Suit

Original Suit No.59/2025

Varkala, Thiruvananthapuram District

2025-11-24

approximately-0 years 10 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Aadil Mohammed et al vs Navas regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

Original Suit No. 270/2022

Thiruvananthapuram District

2025-11-27

approximately-4 years 11 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Navas vs Bindhu et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction and fixation of boundary

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 324/ 2021

Varkala, Thiruvananthapuram District

2025-11-27

approximately-4 years 1 month

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Canara Bank et al vs Elsy Michael et al regarding loan recovery

Original Suit

Original Suit No. 64/2023

Varkala, Thiruvananthapuram District

2025-11-29

approximately-2 years 5 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Devadas et al vs Deputy Tahsildhar regarding declaration and granting a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 149/ 2018

Varkala

2025-12-01

approximately-7 years 9 months

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9650

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

20%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed due to non-payment of associated fees for filing or issuing notices.

Found in 20 cases (20%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Provided

Insufficient evidence to demonstrate the respondents' means or necessary facts led to case dismissals.

Found in 18 cases (18%) High Impact

Failure to Take Steps in Case

Plaintiffs failed to take necessary procedural steps, such as issuing notices or following up on filings.

Found in 16 cases (16%) Medium Impact

Absence of the Petitioner

Petition dismissals frequently occurred when the petitioner did not appear in court as required.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Provided

Failure to Take Steps in Case

Absence of the Petitioner

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?