Case Summary
This is a suit for granting a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction. Plaintiffs are siblings and the defendant is their father, involved in a dispute over property ownership.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Permanent prohibitory injunction is granted in favour of the plaintiffs.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit is decreed with a permanent prohibitory injunction granted in favor of the plaintiffs, restraining the defendant from trespassing into the property.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Plaintiffs established their case through unchallenged oral and documentary evidence.
Plaintiffs established their case through unchallenged oral and documentary evidence.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Plaintiffs established their case through unchallenged oral and documentary evidence.
Plaintiffs established their case through unchallenged oral and documentary evidence.
Supporting Evidence
Through the unchallenged oral and documentary evidence adduced by the plaintiffs, the plaintiffs have established their case.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: 1.A permanent prohibitory injunction is granted in favour of the plaintiffs and the defendant is restrained from encroaching into the plaint schedule property and the residential building therein.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Aadil Mohammed
- Party Age
- 22
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Aadam Mohammed
- Party Age
- 20
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Navas
- Party Age
- 48
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Power of Attorney executed by the plaintiffs, Certified copy of Settlement deed No. 812/2015, Tax receipt.
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Saj. S. Sivan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Permanent Injunction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
A permanent prohibitory injunction is granted in favour of the plaintiffs.
Evidence:
So the plaintiffs are entitled to get a permanent prohibitory injunction.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Power of Attorney
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Power of attorney executed by the plaintiffs in favour of PW1.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type:
Settlement Deed
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of settlement deed No. 812/2015 Kadakkavoor S.R.O.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type:
Tax receipt
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Tax receipt dated 20.02.2021.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type:
Oral Evidence
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
The testimony of PW1 supported the plaintiffs' claims.
Reference:
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Aadil Mohammed et al vs Navas regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Aadil Mohammed et al vs Navas regarding permanent prohibitory injunction