| Niyamam AI

Displaying 681 - 685 of 21892

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Joseph Kurian et al vs P.K.John et al regarding supplementary final decree.

Civil Suit

OS No. 189 /2004

2025-08-27

approximately-21 years

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Bharathy et al vs Shaju regarding declaration and injunction

Civil Suit

OS 76/2020

Vaikom, Kottayam

2025-08-27

approximately-5 years 2 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Binnu Thomas vs Sheebamol N.D regarding return of money.

Civil Suit

OS 37/2024

Vaikom

2025-08-27

approximately-1 year 10 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Ashokan vs Manikuttan et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

OS 179/2023

Vaikom

2025-08-27

approximately-2 years 19 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Vadakkumcore Chit PVT Ltd. vs Haris regarding cheque dishonour.

Criminal Case

ST 10/2023

Vaikom

2025-09-15

approximately-7 years 5 months

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9643

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

25%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs failed to pay necessary fees for court procedures, leading to dismissal of their petitions.

Found in 25 cases (25%) High Impact

Absence of Evidence

Lack of evidence to support claims often resulted in the dismissal of plaintiffs' cases.

Found in 20 cases (20%) High Impact

Failure to Take Steps

Plaintiffs frequently failed to take necessary actions, such as issuing notices, leading to dismissals.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

Non-Representation in Court

Many plaintiffs did not appear or provide representation in court, resulting in case dismissals.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Absence of Evidence

Failure to Take Steps

Non-Representation in Court

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?