Case Summary
This case involves a petition filed by the defendants for a supplementary final decree concerning the allotment of shares in a property dispute. The petitioners assert that all parties except themselves have received their respective shares.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
A supplementary final decree is passed allocating a plot to the petitioners.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
A supplementary final decree has been passed allocating specific shares of property to the petitioners. Costs of the suit are to be borne by the petitioners, and conditions for producing stamp papers are set.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found that the petitioners had not received their shares as per previous orders.
The court found that the petitioners had not received their shares as per previous orders.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found that the petitioners had not received their shares as per previous orders.
The court found that the petitioners had not received their shares as per previous orders.
Supporting Evidence
It appears that in I.A 2193/2007 and I.A 647/2009 this Court had passed an order and the respective shares of the respondents were allotted to them.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, a supplementary final decree is passed as follows: a. The plot denoted with letters 'e x w k j i e' having an extent of 89.277 cents worth ₹.3,21,435/- is set apart wholly to the share of 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th petitioners.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Joseph Kurian
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- P.K.Mathew
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- P.K.Thressiamma @ Reetha
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- P.K.Mery
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Aley Kurian
- Relation
- W/o Late Kuriyan
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- P.K.John
- Relation
- S/o Kurian
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Mary Chacko
- Relation
- W/o Late Kuriyan Chacko
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Shajan Chacko
- Relation
- S/o Late Kuriyan Chacko
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Elizabeth @ Sheena Chacko
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- S.Premanand
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- P.M.Natesan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Declaration
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
A supplementary final decree is passed regarding the share of the petitioners.
Evidence:
Accordingly plot ‘e x w k j I e’ having an extent of 89.277 cents having worth ₹.3,21,435/- is set apart wholly to the share of 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th petitioners.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Commission Report and Sketch
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
This document outlines the share allotted to the petitioners in the plaint schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.C2(a)
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Vaikom
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Joseph Kurian et al vs P.K.John et al regarding supplementary final decree.
Case Code Year
Case between Joseph Kurian et al vs P.K.John et al regarding supplementary final decree.