| Niyamam AI

Displaying 4216 - 4220 of 22062

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Sajigopal et al vs Rajagopal regarding civil suit

Civil Suit

O.S No. 131/2023

Ernakulam

2024-07-24

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between P.Prakash vs Mohankumar K.S regarding settlement in mediation

Civil Suit

O.S No. 184/2024

Ernakulam

2024-07-24

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Remani O.P et al vs Usha Surendran et al regarding partition and separate possession

Civil Suit

O.S No. 722/2021

Ernakulam

2024-07-25

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Ajitha Kumari P.C. vs P.C. Santhosh Kumar regarding cancellation of deed

Civil Suit

O.S No. 750/2023

Ernakulam

2024-07-25

approximately-3 years 5 months

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Concert O Castle Owners Association vs Licy Kurian et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction and mandatory injunction.

Civil Suit

O.S No. 1297/2019

Ernakulam

2024-07-25

approximately-5 years

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9724

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

31%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta or Fees

Plaintiffs failed to pay the necessary court fees or batta, leading to case dismissal for default.

Found in 31 cases (31%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Plaintiffs did not provide sufficient evidence to establish their claims or the means of the respondents.

Found in 27 cases (27%) High Impact

Absence of Plaintiffs in Court

Cases were often dismissed due to the plaintiffs not appearing in court at the scheduled hearings.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Failure to Issue Notices

Plaintiffs neglected to take steps to issue necessary notices to the respondents, resulting in case dismissal.

Found in 14 cases (14%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta or Fees

Lack of Evidence Presented

Absence of Plaintiffs in Court

Failure to Issue Notices

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?