Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 131/2023

Case between Sajigopal et al vs Rajagopal regarding civil suit

Court
COURT OF THE I ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2024-07-24
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, Sajigopal and Sindhu, are involved in a civil suit against the defendant Rajagopal. The matter was settled through mediation, resulting in a compromise agreement.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiffs based on a mediation settlement. The plaintiffs are entitled to a refund of the court fee.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Refund of court fee
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiffs based on a mediation settlement. The plaintiffs are entitled to a refund of the court fee.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The matter was settled in mediation and the terms were found lawful.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The matter was settled in mediation and the terms were found lawful.
Supporting Evidence
Terms of the agreement found lawful.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit is decreed as per the compromise agreement.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sajigopal
Party Age
56
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sindhu
Party Age
58
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rajagopal
Party Age
54
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
A.Balagopalan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
A. Rajagopal
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
T.R.Madhu
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Suit decreed as per the compromise agreement.
Evidence:
Hence suit is decreed as per the compromise agreement.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff entitled for refund of court fee.
Evidence:
Plaintiff shall be entitled for refund of court fee.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Mediation Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The court received the mediation report along with the compromise agreement.
Reference:
Document Type: Compromise agreement
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The court acknowledged the terms of the compromise agreement found lawful and decreed the suit accordingly.
Reference:

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sajigopal et al vs Rajagopal regarding civil suit
Case Code Year
Case between Sajigopal et al vs Rajagopal regarding civil suit

Case Flags

Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 07/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Wed, 07/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won