| Niyamam AI

Displaying 2906 - 2910 of 21904

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Bank of Baroda vs GMS Trading et al regarding recovery of money

Civil Suit

O.S. No 901/2023

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-11-24

approximately-6 years 3 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Arunkumar et al vs M. Mumtas Beegum regarding injunction

Injunction

OS.No.1955/2025

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-11-24

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Sukumari.C vs Siju.R et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

OS. No.1833/2022

Thiruvananthapuram

2025-11-25

approximately-3 years 10 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Synclostica Gomez vs Mary Jude @ Sheela regarding IA.No.7/2025

Civil Suit

O.S. No.1178/2018

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-11-25

approximately-7 years 0 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Pradeep. S vs Muhammed Ismail et al regarding payment for additional work on an apartment

Civil Suit

OS.1287/2022

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-11-25

approximately-3 years 5 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9650

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

32%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Failure to Pay Required Fees

Plaintiffs often failed to pay necessary court fees or batta, leading to case dismissal.

Found in 32 cases (32%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Plaintiffs failed to present sufficient evidence supporting their claims or the means of respondents.

Found in 25 cases (25%) Medium Impact

Default Due to Non-Representation

Cases were dismissed because the plaintiffs did not appear or represent themselves in court.

Found in 21 cases (21%) Medium Impact

Inaction on Case Steps

Plaintiffs failed to take necessary steps, such as issuing notices, leading to case dismissals.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Failure to Pay Required Fees

Lack of Evidence Presented

Default Due to Non-Representation

Inaction on Case Steps

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?