Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No.1178/2018

Case between Synclostica Gomez vs Mary Jude @ Sheela regarding IA.No.7/2025

Court
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Judge
Sri.Mithun Gopi.G.S.
Order Date
2025-11-25
Duration
approximately-7 years 0 days
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Synclostica Gomez, represented by her Power of Attorney Holder, is the petitioner seeking certain reliefs. Mary Jude @ Sheela is the counter petitioner in this matter.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the IA and appointed an advocate commissioner and a surveyor to assist in the matter. The applicant is required to make specific payments and file a memo regarding the same.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
IA is allowed and an advocate commissioner is appointed.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the IA and appointed an advocate commissioner and a surveyor to assist in the matter. The applicant is required to make specific payments and file a memo regarding the same.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court determined the need for further proceedings to elucidate disputes.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court determined the need for further proceedings to elucidate disputes.
Supporting Evidence
The court determined the need for further proceedings to elucidate disputes.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, for ascertaining the matters in the application and for elucidating the disputes between the parties, this IA is allowed. Advocate Smt.Adithya.M.Lal is appointed as advocate commissioner.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Synclostica Gomez
Party Age
80
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mary Jude @ Sheela
Party Age
56
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.K.S.Gopinathan Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Advs.S.P.Suresh Kumar and Sri.Sheeba P. Maman
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Unknown
Advocate Name
Advocate Smt.Adithya.M.Lal
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Law Firm
C/o Adv.Ram Mohan

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The court allowed the application for ascertaining the matters.
Evidence:
Hence, for ascertaining the matters in the application and for elucidating the disputes between the parties, this IA is allowed.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Appointment of an advocate commissioner and a surveyor.
Evidence:
Advocate Smt.Adithya.M.Lal, C/o Adv.Ram Mohan is appointed as advocate commissioner and Sri.Sajeev.O.S is appointed as the Surveyor to assist the advocate commissioner.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Direction to the applicant to deposit batta.
Evidence:
The applicant is directed to deposit batta of Rs.4,500/- to the advocate commissioner and Rs.3,500/- to the surveyor within 30 days.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Direction to the advocate commissioner to file the report.
Evidence:
The advocate commissioner is directed to file the report on or before 29/01/2026 after serving copies to the parties.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Order
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The court passed an order appointing an advocate commissioner and a surveyor.
Reference:
Document Type: Affidavit
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The affidavit was perused by the court.
Reference:
Document Type: Written Statement
Submitted By: Unknown
Relevance:
The written statement was perused by the court.
Reference:

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Synclostica Gomez vs Mary Jude @ Sheela regarding IA.No.7/2025
Case Code Year
Case between Synclostica Gomez vs Mary Jude @ Sheela regarding IA.No.7/2025

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Mon, 01/01/2018 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Sat, 11/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 11/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Lalitha et al regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak vs Babu Chettiyar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won