| Niyamam AI

Displaying 2691 - 2695 of 21904

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Baby Girija vs Gopalakrishnan regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.

Counter Claim

COUNTER CLAIM . No. 144/2018

Varkala

2025-06-10

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Shamsudeen. A vs State of Kerala regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

Original Suit No. 247/2022

Varkala, Thiruvananthapuram

2025-06-11

approximately-2 years 11 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Thankamani vs Devadas et al regarding disputes over property boundaries

Civil Suit

Original Suit No. 34/2017

2025-06-11

approximately-8 years

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Rajendran vs Sudheendran regarding settlement of disputes

Original Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 210/2022

Varkala, Kerala

2025-06-11

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Amanulla vs Saleena Beegum et al regarding seeking forensic examination of a release deed.

Civil Suit

OS NO. 243/ 2018

Varkala

2025-06-11

approximately-6 years 7 months

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9650

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

35%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Fees or Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay required fees or batta, leading to case dismissals.

Found in 35 cases (35%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Submitted

Many plaintiffs did not provide sufficient evidence to establish claims or prove means of payment.

Found in 28 cases (28%) Medium Impact

Failure to Take Necessary Steps

Plaintiffs often neglected to proceed with necessary procedural steps, such as issuing notices.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Absence of Petitioners in Court

Dismissing cases occurred often due to the absence of petitioners during hearings.

Found in 12 cases (12%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Fees or Batta

Lack of Evidence Submitted

Failure to Take Necessary Steps

Absence of Petitioners in Court

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?