Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS NO. 243/ 2018

Case between Amanulla vs Saleena Beegum et al regarding seeking forensic examination of a release deed.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Judge
Sri. ARAVIND. P
Order Date
2025-06-11
Duration
approximately-6 years 7 months
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The petitioner, Amanulla, is seeking forensic examination of a release deed dated 25.10.1976. The suit is for partition of property and to set aside the contested release deed.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the petition for forensic examination of the disputed release deed.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the petition for forensic examination of the disputed release deed.
Key Reasoning:
The court found that the petition was devoid of merits and would delay the trial.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
This court finds force in the argument urged by the learned counsel for the respondents with regard to this aspect. So this court is having no hesitation to conclude that the petition is devoid of merits and liable to be dismissed.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, petition is dismissed. No order as to costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Amanulla
Party Age
71
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Saleena Beegum
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rajeena Beegum
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shabana Shahir
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sharon Muhammed Iqbal
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Sugathan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Adv. V. Ramesh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
A petition for sending the release deed No. 3724/1976 for forensic examination was filed.
Evidence:
So this court finds force in the argument urged by the learned counsel for the respondents with regard to this aspect. So this court is having no hesitation to conclude that the petition is devoid of merits and liable to be dismissed.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
Costs to be decided.
Evidence:
Considering the facts and circumstances of the petition, both parties can be directed to suffer their respective costs.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Release deed
Submitted By: Unknown
Relevance:
The court discussed the validity of release deed No. 3724/1976 dated 25.10.1976 and ordered it to be sent for forensic examination.
Reference:
null

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Amanulla vs Saleena Beegum et al regarding seeking forensic examination of a release deed.
Case Code Year
Case between Amanulla vs Saleena Beegum et al regarding seeking forensic examination of a release deed.

Quick Facts

Location
Varkala
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Case Filed
Thu, 11/01/2018 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Thu, 05/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Sunitha vs Shibu Purushothaman regarding temporary injunction.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between The Federal Bank, Ltd vs Siyad. S, Haseena Beevi regarding suit dismissal
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Margaret Solomon Cruz et al vs Mabel James et al regarding declaration of title and injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Babu Rajan N. et al vs The Government Of Kerala regarding declaration of civil death
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sheena vs Anvar et al regarding temporary injunction against illegal business.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Defendant Won