| Niyamam AI

Displaying 18471 - 18475 of 21904

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Aboobacker vs Muhammadkutty et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction and for damages.

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 230 OF 2016

2019-02-14

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Secratary vs Asharaf Parambatti et al regarding full satisfaction of decree.

Execution Petition

EP 320/2018

Malappuram

2019-02-13

0 years, 2 months, 1 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Secratary vs Sukumaran regarding EP

Execution Petition

EP 366/2018

Tirur,Malappuram

2019-02-20

0 years, 2 months, 1 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Secratary vs Sasidharan Devaruparambil et al regarding Execution Petition

Execution Petition

EP 367/2018

Tirur,Malappuram

2019-02-20

0 years, 2 months, 1 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between M.K. Hamza vs K.P. Muhammed Ali regarding Offence under N.I. Act.

Criminal Case

S.T. No:33/2018

Tirur

2019-02-20

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9650

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

22%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiff frequently failed to pay associated fees, leading to case dismissals for default.

Found in 22 cases (22%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence

Plaintiffs often did not present sufficient evidence to substantiate their claims or prove the defendants' financial capacity.

Found in 20 cases (20%) High Impact

Failure to Take Steps

Several cases were dismissed due to plaintiffs neglecting to take necessary procedural steps, such as issuing notices.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

Non-Representation

The absence of plaintiffs in court frequently resulted in dismissals for non-representation.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence

Failure to Take Steps

Non-Representation

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?