Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 230 OF 2016

Case between Aboobacker vs Muhammadkutty et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction and for damages.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Judge
Smt.NIMMI.K.K.
Order Date
2019-02-14
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Aboobacker is the plaintiff in this case, while Muhammadkutty and others are the defendants. The case involves a suit for a permanent prohibitory injunction and for damages, which was settled in Adalath.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit was decreed in part as per the terms of the settlement reached.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was decreed in part as per the terms of the settlement reached.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Not available

Judgment Evidence:

Received and suit decreed in part as per terms of Razi and Award.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Aboobacker
Party Age
53
Relation
S/o.
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Muhammadkutty
Party Age
65
Relation
S/o.
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shabeer
Party Age
39
Relation
S/o.
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Abdurahiman
Party Age
39
Relation
S/o.
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Noushadali
Party Age
35
Relation
S/o.
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. A. Mamu
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. E.K. Ashraf Sulaiman
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.T.P.Abdul Jabbar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.Mehroof Shihab
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Partly Granted
Description:
Plaintiff seeks permanent prohibitory injunction.
Evidence:
Received and suit decreed in part as per terms of Razi and Award.
Relief Type: Damages
Outcome: Partly Granted
Description:
Plaintiff requests damages.
Evidence:
Received and suit decreed in part as per terms of Razi and Award.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Aboobacker vs Muhammadkutty et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction and for damages.
Case Code Year
Case between Aboobacker vs Muhammadkutty et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction and for damages.

Case Flags

Adalath Resolved

Quick Facts

Location
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Fri, 02/01/2019 - 12:00
To
Thu, 02/28/2019 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Hamza vs Erattaparambil Hamza et al regarding petition allowance with costs
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Mullanmadakkal Mammi vs Beeran Haji et al regarding petition on medical grounds
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vettikkat Parikkuzhiyil Beerali vs Thayyil Kader Haji regarding unknown matter
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between P.Damkumar vs Palakkavalappil Puthiyamaliyekkal Gulam Ali et al regarding default
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Muhammed Thameem vs Muhammed Abdul Noor regarding Default Judgment
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit Defendant Won