| Niyamam AI

Displaying 14776 - 14780 of 15035

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Beepathu vs Ashraf et al regarding Civil Procedure Code

Civil Procedure Code

ORIGINAL PETITION (Pauper) No. 102 OF 2016

Tirur

2018-01-01

1 year

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Neeli et al vs Kali et al regarding partition

Partition

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 257 OF 2015

2019-12-06

Dismissed

View Full Details

Case between Jaisal vs Accomplishing Marketing Company regarding Not mentioned

Not mentioned

Restor.P 2833/2017

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-12-21

0 years, 0 months, 23 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Koprambrath Karappan vs Manoj regarding dismissal of petition

Civil Petition

Restor. 2444/2017

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-12-16

0 years, 1 months, 24 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Karappan et al vs Appu et al regarding Representation Absent

Civil Suit

FDA 628/2008

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-12-15

9 years, 8 months, 28 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

39%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 15,022 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 4.2 years

Settlement Likelihood 14%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 574 cases)
Sale deed (in 480 cases)
Tax receipt (in 375 cases)
Land Tax Receipt (in 183 cases)
Death Certificate (in 182 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 5903
Defendant Won: 8099

8102

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

35%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Absence of the Plaintiff

Frequent dismissal occurred due to the plaintiffs’ absence during hearings or lack of representation.

Found in 35 cases (35%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Plaintiffs consistently failed to provide necessary evidence to support their cases.

Found in 25 cases (25%) Medium Impact

Non-Payment of Required Costs

The petitions were often dismissed due to the plaintiffs' failure to pay necessary fees or costs.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Failure to Take Action

Dismissing cases where plaintiffs did not take required steps, such as filing documents or issuing notices.

Found in 10 cases (10%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Absence of the Plaintiff

Lack of Evidence Presented

Non-Payment of Required Costs

Failure to Take Action

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?