Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL PETITION (Pauper) No. 102 OF 2016

Case between Beepathu vs Ashraf et al regarding Civil Procedure Code

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
SMT. VINCY.T.V.
Order Date
2018-01-01
Duration
1 year
Case Closed
Mon, 01/01/2018 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Two petitioners filed under Civil Procedure Code dismissed for non-appearance.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The Original Petition was dismissed due to the non-appearance of the petitioners.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Dismissal of Original Petition
Case Type
Civil Procedure Code
Final Judgment
No
The Original Petition was dismissed due to the non-appearance of the petitioners.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned.
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned.
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Petition filed u/s 26, Order 7 Rule 1 of Civil Procedure Code. Petitioners not present. Not ready for enquiry. Hence OP is dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Beepathu
Party Age
62
Relation
W/o Kammuttakath Kunhimon
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Hafseena
Party Age
24
Relation
W/o Anwar
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ashraf
Party Age
38
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Usman
Party Age
36
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shabeer
Party Age
28
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shihab
Party Age
27
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Harshad
Party Age
26
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Hamzakoya
Party Age
40
Relation
S/o Saidu
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Musthafa
Party Age
36
Relation
Marakkarakath, s/o Kunhimuhammed
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jafar
Party Age
28
Relation
Kunhalakath, s/o Assainar
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ismail
Relation
Kunharkadavath, s/o Moideen
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Yoonas
Party Age
26
Relation
S/o Azeez
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.C.Nandakumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.P.P.Basheer
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.I.V.Ratheesh
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Dismissal of Original Petition
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Dismissal due to non-appearance of petitioners
Evidence:
Petition filed u/s 26, Order 7 Rule 1 of Civil Procedure Code. Petitioners not present. Not ready for enquiry. Hence OP is dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Procedure Code
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Beepathu vs Ashraf et al regarding Civil Procedure Code
Case Code Year
Case between Beepathu vs Ashraf et al regarding Civil Procedure Code

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Fri, 01/01/2016 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 01/01/2018 - 12:00
From
Mon, 01/01/2018 - 12:00
To
Wed, 01/31/2018 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Aboobcker et al vs Kuttihassan et al regarding petition under Order IX, Rule 4 of Civil Procedure Code
THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Civil Procedure Code Defendant Won
Case between Parnnangadi Sreenivasan, S/o. Raman vs Edayath Abdul Majeed regarding realization of amount
MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Civil Procedure Code Plaintiff Won
Case between Krishnan, Dineshan vs Ganeshan et al regarding injunction
THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Civil Procedure Code Plaintiff Won
Case between Hamza vs Erattaparambil Hamza et al regarding petition allowance with costs
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Nadambadi Santhakumari vs Secretary regarding unspecified matter
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Civil Dispute Plaintiff Won