| Niyamam AI

Displaying 13306 - 13310 of 15102

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Thahira vs Shahid Ahammed regarding rent control issues.

Interlocutory Application

Rent Control Petition No. 41 Of 2017

Tirur

2019-10-14

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Fathima Beevi et al vs Kunhan Bava et al regarding setting out way and injunction.

Civil Suit

Original Suit No. 172 OF 2015

2019-10-11

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Kunnamkulam Financing Company Ltd. vs Abdul Majeed regarding sale confirmation.

Execution Petition

KLML130004432016

Tirur, Malappuram

2019-10-11

3 years, 4 months, 18 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Secratary vs Bijumone et al regarding Loan satisfaction.

Execution Petition

EP 52/2019

Malappuram

2019-10-11

0 years, 8 months, 5 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Secratary vs Hassan Chenganakkattil et al regarding decree execution.

Decree Execution

EP 433/2018

Malappuram

2019-10-16

0 years, 9 months, 26 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

39%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 15,022 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 4.2 years

Settlement Likelihood 14%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 574 cases)
Sale deed (in 480 cases)
Tax receipt (in 375 cases)
Land Tax Receipt (in 183 cases)
Death Certificate (in 182 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 5903
Defendant Won: 8099

8135

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

36%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Absence of Plaintiff in Court

Plaintiffs frequently failed to appear at hearings, resulting in dismissals for lack of representation.

Found in 36 cases (36%) High Impact

Failure to Provide Key Evidence

Plaintiffs often did not produce sufficient evidence to support their claims, leading to case dismissals.

Found in 22 cases (22%) Medium Impact

Non-Payment of Required Costs

Cases were dismissed due to plaintiffs not paying necessary filing fees or costs as directed by the court.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

Lack of Document Production

Plaintiffs failed to produce essential documents to support their claims, resulting in case dismissals.

Found in 14 cases (14%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Absence of Plaintiff in Court

Failure to Provide Key Evidence

Non-Payment of Required Costs

Lack of Document Production

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?