Original Suit No. 172 OF 2015

Case between Fathima Beevi et al vs Kunhan Bava et al regarding setting out way and injunction.

Court

COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR

Judge

Sri. JANKISH NARAYANAN

Order Date

2019-10-11

Duration

Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Fathima Beevi and others are the plaintiffs, while Kunhan Bava and others are the defendants. The case concerns a suit for setting out a way and seeking an injunction.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Case Type

Civil Suit

Final Judgment

The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiffs being absent when the case was called. No further proceedings were made.

Key Reasoning:
Plaintiffs were absent during the proceedings.

Why Defendant Won:
Plaintiffs were absent during the proceedings.

Supporting Evidence

Plaintiffs name called absent.

Judgment Evidence:

Suit dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Fathima Beevi
Party Age: 50
Relation: W/o.

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Dirar
Party Age: 33
Relation: S/o.

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Thesireef
Party Age: 26
Relation: S/o.

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Asoorabeevi
Party Age: 29
Relation: D/o.

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Kunhan Bava
Party Age: 61
Relation: S/o.

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Ibrahim
Party Age: 59
Relation: S/o.

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Ashraf
Party Age: 49
Relation: S/o.

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Fathima
Party Age: 39
Relation: W/o.

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Sri. K. Vipin Chandrasekharan
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Sri. K.M. Shihab
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Sri. Sree Raj.V
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction

Outcome: Refused

Description:

Suit is one for setting out way and injunction.

Evidence: