| Niyamam AI

Displaying 126 - 130 of 15025

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between P.G.Aravindakshan Nair vs Adv.Salmath et al regarding Permanent Prohibitory Injunction

Civil Suit

OS. No. 697/2018

Kollam

2025-07-19

approximately-7 years 2 months

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Akash S et al vs Anandavally regarding partition and permanent prohibitory injunction.

Civil Suit

OS. No. 826/2023

Kollam

2025-07-21

approximately-2 years 1 month

Partial

View Full Details

Case between Patric Martin et al vs Daniel Joseph et al regarding execution application

Execution Application

OS.No. 530/2001

Kollam

2025-07-10

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Prathibha vs Raju et al regarding declaration and injunction

Civil Suit

OS. No. 516/2022

Kollam

2025-07-23

approximately-2 years 1 month

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Hayarunnisa vs Ayoob regarding Injunction

Civil Suit

OS. No. 385/2018

Kollam

2025-07-29

approximately-7 years 4 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

39%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 15,022 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 4.2 years

Settlement Likelihood 14%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 574 cases)
Sale deed (in 480 cases)
Tax receipt (in 375 cases)
Land Tax Receipt (in 183 cases)
Death Certificate (in 182 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 5903
Defendant Won: 8099

8099

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

31%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Dismissals for Absence

Plaintiffs frequently failed due to absence in court, resulting in automatic dismissal for default.

Found in 31 cases (31%) High Impact

Lack of Necessary Evidence

Plaintiffs often dismissed for failing to provide required evidence to support their claims.

Found in 24 cases (24%) Medium Impact

Failure to Pay Costs

Many cases were dismissed due to plaintiffs not paying necessary court costs or fees.

Found in 19 cases (19%) Medium Impact

Non-Production of Documents

Failure to produce required documents led to several petitions being dismissed for lack of compliance.

Found in 16 cases (16%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Dismissals for Absence

Lack of Necessary Evidence

Failure to Pay Costs

Non-Production of Documents

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?