Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No. 516/2022

Case between Prathibha vs Raju et al regarding declaration and injunction

Court
IN THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Judge
Smt. Sofia.T.A.
Order Date
2025-07-23
Duration
approximately-2 years 1 month
Case Closed
Wed, 07/23/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Prathibha, is seeking a declaration of her right to use a pathway and an injunction against the defendants, who are obstructing her access. The case is about the plaintiff's claim over an easement right due to the defendants' obstruction.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, declaring her the rightful owner of the easement to use the contested pathway and restraining the defendants from obstructing her access.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The plaintiff has the easement right to use plaint C schedule pathway for ingress and egress to the plaint A schedule property.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, declaring her the rightful owner of the easement to use the contested pathway and restraining the defendants from obstructing her access.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff successfully proved her case with sufficient evidence without rebuttal.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
By producing Exts. A1 and A2 and by deposing in tune with the plaint averments in the affidavit, the plaintiff has succeeded in proving her case.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, this suit is decreed in part as follows: (i) It is hereby declared that the plaintiff has the easement right to use plaint C schedule pathway for ingress and egress to the plaint A schedule property.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Prathibha
Party Age
41
Relation
W/o.Vinod Kumar
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Raju
Party Age
55
Relation
S/o.Parameswaran Achary
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rajith Kumar
Party Age
56
Relation
S/o.Gopi
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Pradeep
Party Age
40
Relation
S/o.Murali
Plaintiffs Documents
Certified copy of deed no.4269/2009, Tax receipt dated 08/06/2024
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Anub B. Mundakkal
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Amit Krishna
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Saina. S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Aromal P Pillai
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Declaration
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Declaration of easement right to use plaint C schedule pathway for ingress and egress to the plaint A schedule property.
Evidence:
It is hereby declared that the plaintiff has the easement right to use plaint C schedule pathway for ingress and egress to the plaint A schedule property.
Relief Type: Mandatory Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Restraint on the defendants from obstructing the plaintiff and family from using the C schedule pathway.
Evidence:
The defendants are hereby restrained from any kind of obstruction to the plaintiff and family from their ingress and egress through C scheduled pathway.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Entitlement to recover costs of the suit from the defendants.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to realise costs of the suit from the defendants.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Title deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of Deed No.4269/2009 establishing ownership over the plaint A schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Tax receipt dated 08/06/2024 issued from Mayyanadu village in the name of Smt. Prathibha.
Reference:
Ext.A2

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Prathibha vs Raju et al regarding declaration and injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Prathibha vs Raju et al regarding declaration and injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Sat, 07/23/2022 - 12:00
Case Closed
Wed, 07/23/2025 - 12:00
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Vijayendran, Chithra vs Yamunadevi regarding review of order
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Navasudeen.S vs Sira Group regarding review of an earlier order
Court of the Munsiff, Kollam
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sajeev vs T.Unnikrishna Pillai regarding setting aside an exparte decree.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Gopakumar vs K.S.Abdul Manaf regarding Realisation of Money
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM.
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Bank of India vs Shibina. S et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won