| Niyamam AI

Displaying 336 - 340 of 493

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Abdul Gafoor vs Azeez et al regarding boundary fixation and injunction

Civil Suit - Boundary fixation and Injunction

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 192 OF 2017

Tirur

2018-04-07

1 year

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Muhammed Kassim et al vs Thunchan Memorial College et al regarding injunction

Civil Suit - Injunction

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 380 OF 2015

Tirur

2018-03-31

2 years

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Kamalbasha et al vs Yoosaf et al regarding injunction

Civil Suit - Injunction

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 388 OF 2015

Tirur

2018-03-31

2 years

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Hamza et al vs Junais Rehman.K regarding injunction

Civil Suit - Injunction

Original Suit No. 386 OF 20 15

Tirur

2018-03-16

Dismissed

View Full Details

Case between Kunheema et al vs Chittappurath et al regarding injunction

Civil Suit - Injunction

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 44 OF 20 15

Tirur

2018-03-14

3 years

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

53%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 495 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength Medium Impact

Average Case Duration 3.2 years

Settlement Likelihood 4%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 119 cases)
Tax receipt (in 114 cases)
Sale deed (in 70 cases)
Land Tax Receipt (in 45 cases)
Settlement Deed (in 40 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 262
Defendant Won: 205

205

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

47%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Plaintiff Absent During Hearings

Numerous cases were dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence during critical court proceedings.

Found in 47 cases (47%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Provided

Plaintiffs consistently failed to present sufficient evidence to support their claims, resulting in case dismissals.

Found in 21 cases (21%) Medium Impact

No Legal Representation

Dismissals occurred due to plaintiffs lacking legal representation during hearings, hampering their ability to press their case.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

Matters Resolved Outside Court

Several cases were dismissed as the disputes were settled amicably between the parties before court proceedings concluded.

Found in 12 cases (12%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Plaintiff Absent During Hearings

Lack of Evidence Provided

No Legal Representation

Matters Resolved Outside Court

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?