Case Summary
The suit for injunction was filed by Kunheema and others against Chittappurath and others. However, the suit was rejected by the court due to non-payment of court fees.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Injunction
Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The court rejected the suit for injunction due to non-payment of court fees.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Kunheema @ Pathummakutty Umma
- Party Age
- 83
- Relation
- Daughter of Madathil Valappil Avarankutty
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Kunheema
- Party Age
- 46
- Relation
- Daughter of Kambath Ahammed Kutty Haji
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Chittappurath Sulaiman
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- Son of Muhammed Haji
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Kambath Marakkar
- Party Age
- 52
- Relation
- Son of Ahammed Kutty Haji
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Kambath Avaran
- Party Age
- 66
- Relation
- Son of Kambath Ahammed
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Kambath Alavikkutty
- Party Age
- 55
- Relation
- Son of Kambath Ahammed
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Kambath Hussain
- Party Age
- 60
- Relation
- Son of Kambath Ahammed
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Mymoona
- Party Age
- 47
- Relation
- Wife of Ayappalli Saithalavi, Daughter of Kambath Ahammed
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. M.A. Ismail
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. P.P. Abdul Hameed
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. K.V. Sabir
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Gopi Kadavath
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
Injunction suit rejected due to non-payment of court fees
Evidence:
No batta seen deposited against D3 to D6. No balance court fee paid. No Balance court fee has been deposited even after giving sufficient chances. Hence rejected under order 7 Rule 11 of the Code of the Civil Procedure.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Category
Injunction and Access Rights
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Kunheema et al vs Chittappurath et al regarding injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Kunheema et al vs Chittappurath et al regarding injunction