| Niyamam AI

Displaying 19971 - 19975 of 21904

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Aneesh Banu et al vs Hussain et al regarding injunction

Civil Suit - Injunction

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 348 OF 20 17

Tirur

2017-12-21

Not mentioned

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Catholic Syrian Bank vs Sanu M.V. et al regarding debt recovery

Civil Suit - Debt Recovery

EP 108/2016

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-12-21

1 year, 9 months, 5 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Perumanna Klari Service Sahakarana Bank vs Riyasuddeen Poolakal regarding default inquiry

Civil Suit

EP 72/2017

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-12-21

0 years, 9 months, 18 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Beekkutty et al vs Riyas et al regarding partition

Civil Suit - Partition

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 48 OF 20 16

Tirur

2017-12-20

1 year

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Abdu Salam vs Basheer.C. regarding possession recovery

Civil Suit - Recovery of possession

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 369 OF 2016

Tirur

2017-12-20

1 year 11 months 30 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9650

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

20%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed due to not paying the required batta for processing their petitions.

Found in 20 cases (20%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Many cases were dismissed because plaintiffs failed to provide sufficient evidence supporting their claims.

Found in 17 cases (17%) Medium Impact

No Steps Taken in Case

Plaintiffs often lost due to inaction, failing to take necessary procedural steps in their cases.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

Absence of the Petitioner

Numerous petitions were dismissed as plaintiffs were not present during court proceedings.

Found in 12 cases (12%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

No Steps Taken in Case

Absence of the Petitioner

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?