ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 48 OF 20 16

Case between Beekkutty et al vs Riyas et al regarding partition

Court

Court of the Munsiff of Tirur

Judge

Smt. VINCY.T.V.

Order Date

2017-12-20

Duration

1 year

Case Closed

Wed, 12/20/2017 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Two plaintiffs filed a suit for partition against four defendants, seeking to divide the property amongst the co-owners. The court dismissed the suit due to non-payment of batta.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Not mentioned

Case Type

Civil Suit - Partition

Final Judgment

The court dismissed the suit for partition due to non-payment of batta.

Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Suit for partition. No batta seen deposited. Hence dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Beekkutty
Party Age: 60
Relation: Wife of Chettiyam veettil Azeez

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Shaji
Party Age: 35
Relation: Son of Chettiyam veettil Azeez

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Riyas
Party Age: 32
Relation: Son of Chettiyam Veettil Azeez

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Shahida
Party Age: 36
Relation: Wife of Deceased Saleem

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Said Afreedi
Party Age: 15
Relation: Minor, represented by guardian mother Shahida

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Sithara Parveen
Party Age: 11
Relation: Minor, represented by guardian mother Shahida

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Sri. C. Shammughan
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Not entered appearance
Appearance Type: Not entered

Reliefs

Relief Type: Partition

Outcome: Not Decided

Description:

Suit for partition.

Evidence:

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification