| Niyamam AI

Displaying 18226 - 18230 of 21957

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Muhammed kutty et al vs Shajahan regarding realisation of money

Civil Suit

Original Suit No. 328 OF 2017

Tirur Taluk, Thrissur Dist.

2019-07-17

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Secratry vs Askar Chemancheri regarding EP

Execution Petition

KLML130002372019

Malappuram

2019-07-17

0 years, 4 months, 15 days

Unknown

View Full Details

Case between Secratry vs Sukumaran Chettiyamthoid et al regarding Execution Petition.

Execution Petition

EP 100/2019

Malappuram

2019-07-17

0 years, 4 months, 15 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between SEcratary vs Shahid Peedikaparambil et al regarding enforcement proceedings.

Enforcement Proceedings

EP 424/2018

Tirur,Malappuram

2019-07-17

0 years, 6 months, 27 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Cheruvalappil Muhammed et al vs Abdu regarding injunction

Injunction

Original Suit No. 72 OF 2011

2019-07-16

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9673

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

16%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed cases due to non-payment of batta required for proceedings.

Found in 16 cases (16%) Medium Impact

Lack of Representation by Plaintiff

Petitioners often did not appear in court, leading to dismissals for non-representation.

Found in 14 cases (14%) Medium Impact

Insufficient Evidence Presented

Plaintiffs failed to provide adequate evidence to support their claims or demonstrate means of payment.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

Failure to Issue Necessary Notices

Many cases were dismissed due to plaintiffs not issuing required notices to defendants.

Found in 12 cases (12%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Representation by Plaintiff

Insufficient Evidence Presented

Failure to Issue Necessary Notices

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?