Original Suit No. 328 OF 2017

Case between Muhammed kutty et al vs Shajahan regarding realisation of money

Court

COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR

Judge

Sri. Jankish Narayanan

Order Date

2019-07-17

Duration

Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs Muhammed kutty, Thajudheen, and Ahammed kutty are suing the defendant Shajahan for the realization of money. The court found that the balance court fee was not paid and rejected the plaint under Order VII Rule 11.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won

Interim Order

The court found that the balance court fee was not paid, leading to the rejection of the plaint. As a result, the plaintiffs were unable to proceed with their claim.

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Case Type

Civil Suit

Final Judgment

The court found that the balance court fee was not paid, leading to the rejection of the plaint. As a result, the plaintiffs were unable to proceed with their claim.

Key Reasoning:
The plaint was rejected due to the non-payment of balance court fee.

Why Defendant Won:
The plaint was rejected due to the non-payment of balance court fee.

Supporting Evidence

The plaint was rejected due to the non-payment of balance court fee.

Judgment Evidence:

Balance Court Fee not paid. Plaint rejected u/o VII Rule 11.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Muhammed kutty
Party Age: 56
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Thajudheen
Party Age: 43
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Ahammed kutty
Party Age: 68
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Shajahan
Party Age: 37
Relation: S/o

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Sri.Gopi Kadavath
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Sri.C.S.Sivakumar
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery

Outcome: Refused

Description:

Plaint for realisation of money was rejected.

Evidence: