| Niyamam AI

Displaying 631 - 635 of 21881

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Ambili Sidharthan vs Anil Sachith regarding partition

Civil Suit

O S. 295/2024

Vaikom

2025-11-29

approximately-1 year 1 month

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between P.K.Vijayan et al vs K.P Remanan et al regarding declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction.

Civil Suit

O S. 195/2019

Vaikom Taluk, Kerala

2025-11-29

approximately-6 years 6 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Sasi et al vs Santhosh et al regarding settlement in mediation.

Civil Suit

O S. 151/2016

Vaikom Taluk

2025-11-28

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Shaji vs Thankappan, Chellamma regarding permanent prohibitory injunction and mandatory injunction

Civil Suit

O S. 41/2017

Vaikom Taluk, Kerala

2025-11-29

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Kamalasanan et al vs Padmanabhan et al regarding declaration of easement by grant and permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

O.S No.25/2021

Vaikom Taluk

2025-12-02

approximately-4 years 10 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9639

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

29%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay necessary fees, leading to case dismissals for default.

Found in 29 cases (29%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Failure to provide evidence proving respondents' financial means resulted in multiple cases dismissed.

Found in 23 cases (23%) High Impact

Absence of the Petitioner

Cases were often dismissed due to the petitioner's absence during court proceedings.

Found in 19 cases (19%) Medium Impact

No Steps Taken in Case

Many cases were dismissed as plaintiffs failed to take necessary procedural steps.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Absence of the Petitioner

No Steps Taken in Case

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?