Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O S. 151/2016

Case between Sasi et al vs Santhosh et al regarding settlement in mediation.

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Judge
Kum. Abhinimol Rajendran
Order Date
2025-11-28
Duration
Case Closed
Fri, 11/28/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs include Sasi, Vijayamma, and Saiju, while the defendants are Santhosh and Prakash. The case was about a dispute that was settled through mediation, with the terms found to be lawful.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit was decreed in terms of the compromise agreement reached during mediation. The terms were found to be lawful and agreed upon by both parties.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Suit decreed in terms of compromise agreement.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was decreed in terms of the compromise agreement reached during mediation. The terms were found to be lawful and agreed upon by both parties.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Terms of agreement are found to be lawful.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Terms of agreement are found to be lawful.
Supporting Evidence
Terms of agreement are found to be lawful.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit decreed in terms of compromise agreement. Compromise agreement and Plan appended shall form part of the decree.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sasi
Party Age
65
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Vijayamma
Party Age
55
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Saiju
Party Age
41
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Santhosh
Party Age
42
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Prakash
Party Age
49
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Mediation Report, Compromise petition.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
D.Subhash Chandran
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
K.G.Pradeepan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
B.Biju
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Suit decreed in terms of compromise agreement.
Evidence:
Hence suit decreed in terms of compromise agreement.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Mediation Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The mediation report was filed along with the compromise petition, and the terms of agreement were found to be lawful.
Reference:
Document Type: Compromise agreement
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The suit was decreed in terms of the compromise agreement, which forms part of the decree.
Reference:

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Vaikom
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sasi et al vs Santhosh et al regarding settlement in mediation.
Case Code Year
Case between Sasi et al vs Santhosh et al regarding settlement in mediation.

Case Flags

Adalath Resolved
Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Vaikom Taluk
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Vaikom
Case Filed
Case Closed
Fri, 11/28/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Kamala Veni et al vs Rajan et al regarding injunction and fixing the boundaries.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Merykutty vs James et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between George vs Mary regarding mediation settlement
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Simson.P.Mathew vs N.K.Kurian et al regarding injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Ancy vs Jose @ P.S.Joseph et al regarding partition and permanent prohibitory injunction.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won